Crop treatment compatibility

ABSTRACT

In a method of ensuring crop treatment compatibility crop treatment information is received at a computer system. The crop treatment information comprises a real-time location of a crop treatment applicator and a description of a crop treatment resident in the crop treatment applicator. Planted crop treatment information is accessed for a planted field which encompasses the real-time location. The planted crop information comprises a description of a planted crop in the planted field. It is determined whether the crop treatment is compatible with application to the planted crop. In response to determining the crop treatment is not compatible with application to the planted crop, a crop treatment incompatibility action is initiated in real-time from the computer system.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS (CONTINUATION-IN-PART)

This application claims priority and is a continuation-in-part to theco-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/911,046, entitled“Wide-area Agricultural Monitoring and Prediction,” by Robert Lindores,et al., with filing date Oct. 25, 2010, and assigned to the assignee ofthe present patent application.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED U.S. APPLICATIONS

This Application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No.13/280,298 by Robert Lindores, filed on Oct. 24, 2011, entitled“WIDE-AREA AGRICULTURAL MONITORING AND PREDICTION,” and assigned to theassignee of the present patent application.

This Application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No.13/280,306 by Robert Lindores et al., filed on Oct. 24, 2011, entitled“EXCHANGING WATER ALLOCATION CREDITS,” and assigned to the assignee ofthe present patent application.

This Application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No.13/280,312 by Robert Lindores., filed on Oct. 24, 2011, entitled “CROPCHARACTERISTIC ESTIMATION,” and assigned to the assignee of the presentpatent application.

This Application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No.13/280,315 by Robert Lindores, filed on Oct. 24, 2011, entitled “WATEREROSION MANAGEMENT INCORPORATING TOPOGRAPHY, SOIL TYPE, AND WEATHERSTATISTICS,” and assigned to the assignee of the present patentapplication.

BACKGROUND

A modern crop farm may be thought of as a complex biochemical factoryoptimized to produce corn, wheat, soybeans or countless other products,as efficiently as possible. The days of planting in spring and waitinguntil fall harvest to assess results are long gone. Instead, today'sbest farmers try to use all available data to monitor and promote plantgrowth throughout a growing season. Farmers influence their cropsthrough the application of fertilizers, growth regulators, harvest aids,fungicides, herbicides and pesticides. Precise crop monitoring—to helpdecide quantity, location and timing of field applications—has aprofound effect on cost, crop yield and pollution. Normalized differencevegetative index (NDVI) is an example of a popular crop metric.

NDVI is based on differences in optical reflectivity of plants and dirtat different wavelengths. Dirt reflects more visible (VIS) red lightthan near-infrared (NIR) light, while plants reflect more NIR than VIS.Chlorophyll in plants is a strong absorber of visible red light; hence,plants' characteristic green color.

${{NVDI} = \frac{r_{NIR} - r_{VIS}}{r_{NIR} + r_{VIS}}},$where r is reflectivity measured at the wavelength indicated by thesubscript. Typically, NIR is around 770 nm while VIS is around 660 nm.In various agricultural applications, NDVI correlates well with biomass,plant height, nitrogen content or frost damage.

Farmers use NDVI measurements to decide when and how much fertilizer toapply. Early in a growing season it may be hard to gauge how muchfertilizer plants will need over the course of their growth. Too late inthe season, the opportunity to supply missing nutrients may be lost.Thus the more measurements are available during a season, the better.

A crop's yield potential is the best yield obtainable for a particularplant type in a particular field and climate. Farmers often apply a highdose of fertilizer, e.g., nitrogen, to a small part of a field, theso-called “N-rich strip”. This area has enough nitrogen to ensure thatnitrogen deficiency does not retard plant growth. NDVI measurements onplants in other parts of the field are compared with those from theN-rich strip to see if more nitrogen is needed to help the field keep upwith the strip.

The consequences of applying either too much or too little nitrogen to afield can be severe. With too little nitrogen the crop may not achieveits potential and profit may be left “on the table.” Too much nitrogen,on the other hand, wastes money and may cause unnecessary pollutionduring rain runoff. Given imperfect information, farmers tend to overapply fertilizer to avoid the risk of an underperforming crop. Thus,more precise and accurate plant growth measurements save farmers moneyand prevent pollution by reducing the need for over application.

NDVI measurements may be obtained from various sensor platforms, eachwith inherent strengths and weaknesses. Aerial imaging such as satelliteor atmospheric imaging can quickly generate NDVI maps that cover wideareas. However, satellites depend on the sun to illuminate theirsubjects and the sun is rarely, if ever, directly overhead a field whena satellite acquires an image. Satellite imagery is also affected byatmospheric phenomena such as clouds and haze. These effects lead to anunknown bias or offset in NDVI readings obtained by satellites orairplanes. Relative measurements within an image are useful, butcomparisons between images, especially those taken under differentconditions or at different times, may not be meaningful.

Local NDVI measurements may be obtained with ground based systems suchas the Trimble Navigation “GreenSeeker”. A GreenSeeker is an activesensor system that has its own light source that is scannedapproximately one meter away from plant canopy. The light source ismodulated to eliminate interference from ambient light. Visible andnear-infrared reflectivity are measured from illumination that isscanned over a field. Ground-based sensors like the GreenSeeker can bemounted on tractors, spray booms or center-pivot irrigation booms toscan an entire field. (GreenSeekers and other ground-based sensors mayalso be hand-held and, optionally, used with portable positioning anddata collection devices such as laptop computers, portable digitalassistants, smart phones or dedicated data controllers.) Active,ground-based sensors provide absolute measurements that may be comparedwith other measurements obtained at different times, day or night. Itdoes take time, however, to scan the sensors over fields of interest.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Unless noted, the drawings referred to in this brief description ofdrawings should be understood as not being drawn to scale.

FIG. 1 shows a schematic map of nine farm fields with management zones,according to various embodiments.

FIG. 2 shows one of the fields of FIG. 1 in greater detail, according tovarious embodiments.

FIG. 3 shows a schematic satellite image of the fields of FIG. 1,according to various embodiments.

FIG. 4 shows a block diagram of a wide-area field prescription system,according to various embodiments.

FIG. 5 shows a block diagram of a method to combine satellite and grounddata acquired at different times, according to various embodiments.

FIGS. 6A and 6B show a schematic graph of NDVI data obtained atdifferent times via different methods, according to various embodiments.

FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an example wide-area farming informationcollection and dissemination network, according to various embodiments.

FIG. 8 is a block diagram of an example computer system with which orupon which various embodiments described herein may be implemented.

FIG. 9 illustrates a flow diagram of an example method of agriculturalmonitoring and prediction, according to various embodiments.

FIG. 10 is a block diagram of an example GNSS receiver used inaccordance with one embodiment.

FIG. 11 illustrates a flow diagram of an example method of managingwater erosion, according to various embodiments.

FIG. 12 illustrates a defined area and methods for collectingtopographic data in accordance with various embodiments.

FIG. 13 is a block diagram of an example water erosion management systemin accordance with one embodiment.

FIG. 14 illustrates an example crop treatment applicator in a plantedfield, in accordance with various embodiments.

FIG. 15 shows a schematic of nine farm fields, according to variousembodiments.

FIG. 16 is a block diagram of an example crop treatment compatibilitysystem, in accordance with various embodiments.

FIGS. 17A-17B illustrate a flow diagram of an example method of ensuringcrop treatment compatibility, according to various embodiments.

FIG. 18 is an example diagram of a watershed area in accordance withvarious embodiments.

FIG. 19 is a block diagram showing examples of water allocation inaccordance with various embodiments.

FIG. 20 is a flow diagram of an example method of exchanging waterallocation credits in accordance with one embodiment.

FIG. 21 is a block diagram of an example crop characteristic estimationsystem, in accordance with various embodiments.

FIG. 22 illustrates an example estimated crop characteristic map for anunharvested field, according to one or more embodiments.

FIG. 23 illustrates an example of a harvest path generated for anunharvested field, according to one or more embodiments.

FIGS. 24A, 24B, and 24C illustrate a flow diagram of an example methodof crop characteristic estimation, according to various embodiments.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENT(S)

Reference will now be made in detail to various embodiments, examples ofwhich are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the subjectmatter will be described in conjunction with these embodiments, it willbe understood that they are not intended to limit the subject matter tothese embodiments. On the contrary, the subject matter described hereinis intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, whichmay be included within the spirit and scope. In some embodiments, all orportions of the electronic computing devices, units, and componentsdescribed herein are implemented in hardware, a combination of hardwareand firmware, a combination of hardware and computer-executableinstructions, or the like. Furthermore, in the following description,numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thoroughunderstanding of the subject matter. However, some embodiments may bepracticed without these specific details. In other instances, well-knownmethods, procedures, objects, and circuits have not been described indetail as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the subject matter.

Notation and Nomenclature

Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the followingdiscussions, it is appreciated that throughout the present Descriptionof Embodiments, discussions utilizing terms such as “accessing,”“aggregating,” “analyzing,” “applying,” “brokering,” “calibrating,”“checking,” “combining,” “comparing,” “conveying,” “converting,”“correlating,” “creating,” “defining,” “deriving,” “detecting,”“disabling,” “determining,” “enabling,” “estimating,” “filtering,”“finding,” “generating,” “identifying,” “incorporating,” “initiating,”“locating,” “modifying,” “obtaining,” “outputting,” “predicting,”“receiving,” “reporting,” “sending,” “sensing,” “storing,”“transforming,” “updating,” “using,” “validating,” or the like, refer tothe actions and processes of a computer system or similar electroniccomputing device (or portion thereof) such as, but not limited to one ormore or some combination of: a visual organizer system, a requestgenerator, an Internet coupled computing device, and a computer server.The electronic computing device manipulates and transforms datarepresented as physical (electronic) quantities within the electroniccomputing device's processors, registers, and/or memories into otherdata similarly represented as physical quantities within the electroniccomputing device's memories, registers and/or other such informationstorage, processing, transmission, or/or display components of theelectronic computing device or other electronic computing device(s).Under the direction of computer-readable instructions, the electroniccomputing device may carry out operations of one or more of the methodsdescribed herein.

Overview of Discussion

Discussion below is divided into multiple sections. Section 1 describeswide-area agricultural monitoring and prediction. Section 2 describeswater erosion management incorporating topography, soil type, andweather statistics. Section 3 describes aspects of crop treatmentcompatibility. Section 4 describes aspects of exchanging waterallocation credits. Section 5 describes crop characteristic estimation.As described herein, in various embodiments, one or more items ofinformation pertaining to a particular field or farm may be collected byone or more individuals and/or sensors and utilized by a farmer or otherentity to make decisions related to: that field, crops planted in thatfield, one or more other fields, or crops planted in one or more otherfields. Each section tends to focus on collection and/or use of aparticular type or types of information. Although discussedindependently, these various types of information are, in someembodiments, stored in various combinations with one another. Thesevarious types of information may be collected independently or invarious combinations with one another. That is, in some embodiments, anindividual sensor, reporting source, and/or platform described hereinmay collect only a single item of information during a period of time orduring conduct of a particular activity, while in other instances two ormore items of information may be collected during single period of timeor during conduct of a particular activity. A single type of collectedinformation may be used in isolation or in a combination with one ormore other types of collected information.

Section 1: Wide-area Agricultural Monitoring and Prediction

Wide-area agricultural monitoring and prediction encompasses systems andmethods to generate calibrated estimates of plant growth andcorresponding field prescriptions. Data from ground and satellite basedsensors are combined to obtain absolute, calibrated plant metrics, suchas NDVI, over wide areas. Further inputs, such as soil, cropcharacteristics and climate data, are stored in a database. A processoruses the measured plant metrics and database information to createcustomized field prescription maps that show where, when and how muchfertilizer, pesticide or other treatment should be applied to a field tomaximize crop yield.

Ground data are used to remove the unknown bias or offset of overheadaerial images thereby allowing images taken at different times to becompared with each other or calibrated to an absolute value. Soil, cropand climate data may also be stored as images or maps. The volume ofdata stored in the database can be quite large depending on the area ofland covered and the spatial resolution. Simulations of plant growth maybe run with plant and climate models to build scenarios such that afarmer can predict not just what may happen to his crops based onaverage assumptions, but also probabilities for outlying events.

A basic ingredient of any field prescription, however, is an accuratemap of actual plant progress measured in the field. NDVI is used here asa preferred example of a metric for measuring plant growth; however,other parameters, such as the green vegetation index, or otherreflectance-based vegetative indices, may also be useful. FIG. 1 shows aschematic map of nine farm fields, 101, 102 . . . 109, delineated bysolid boundary lines. Dashed lines in the figure show the boundaries offield management zones which are labeled by circled numbers 1, 2 and 3.Management zones are areas of common growing characteristics. Qualitiesthat define a zone may include drainage, soil type, ground slope,naturally occurring nutrients, weed types, pests, etc. Regardless of howzones differ, plants within a zone tend to grow about the same. Targetedfertilizer application within a zone can help smooth out growthvariation. Plants in different zones may require markedly differentfertilizer prescriptions.

FIG. 2 shows field 107 of FIG. 1 in greater detail. The field overlapsthree management zones labeled by circled numbers 1, 2 and 3. Path 205shows the track that a ground-based NDVI scanner like a GreenSeekertakes as it measures plant growth in the field. Ground-based scannerscan be deployed on tractors, spray trucks or other equipment and can beprogrammed to record data whenever the equipment moves over a growingarea. (Groundbased scanners may also be hand-held and connected toportable data collection and/or positioning equipment.) Ground-basedscanners are often used for real-time, variable-rate application, butbecause the scanners are automated, they can run any time, not justduring fertilizer application.

In FIG. 2, gray stripe 210 marks the location of an N-rich strip. TheN-rich strip is an area where an excess of nitrogen fertilizer has beenapplied. Plant growth in the N-rich strip is not limited by theavailability of nitrogen, so those plants exhibit the maximum yieldpotential of similar plants in the field. Because N-rich strips areuseful for yield potential calculations, measurement of NDVI in anN-rich strip is often part of a real-time, variable-rate applicationprocedure. N-rich strips are not always needed, however. The performanceof the top 10% of plants in a representative part of a field may providean adequate standard for maximum yield potential, for example.

FIG. 3 shows a schematic satellite image of the fields of FIG. 1. Thearea of land illustrated in FIG. 3 is the same as the area shown inFIG. 1. The land in FIG. 3 has been divided into pixels (e.g., 301, 302,303, 304) similar to those that may be obtained by satellite imaging.FIG. 3 is drawn for purposes of illustration only; it is not to scale.Pixels in an actual satellite image may represent areas in the range ofroughly 1 m² to roughly 100 m². The resolution of today's satelliteimages is suitable for agricultural purposes; it is no longer a limitingfactor as was the case several years ago.

Scale 305 in FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of an NDVI scale.Darker pixels represent higher values of NDVI. Although only fiverelative NDVI levels are shown in FIG. 3, much higher precision isavailable from actual satellite images. Actual satellite images,however, do not provide absolute NDVI with the high accuracy availableusing ground-based sensors. Variations in lighting (i.e., position ofthe sun), atmospheric effects (e.g., clouds, haze, dust, rain, etc.),and satellite position all introduce biases and offsets that aredifficult to quantify.

It is apparent that NDVI measurements for the set of fields shown inFIGS. 1 and 3 may be obtained by either ground or satellite sensors.Ground measurements provide absolute NDVI at high accuracy whilesatellite measurements provide relative NDVI over wide areas. Whenground and satellite data are available for a common area at times thatare not too far apart, the ground data may be used to resolve theunknown bias or offset in the satellite data. As an example, if field107 in FIG. 1 is measured by a GreenSeeker scan and fields 101 through109 (including 107) are measured by satellite imaging, then overlappingground and satellite data for field 107 can be used to calibrate thesatellite data for all of the fields. The accuracy of ground-based datahas been extended to a wide area. Generally “times that are not too farapart” are within a few days of one another; however, the actual maximumtime difference for useful calibration depends on how fast plants aregrowing. Measurements must be closer together in time for fast-growingcrops. Methods to estimate plant growth rate and extend the amount bywhich ground and satellite measurements can be separated in time arediscussed below.

FIG. 4 shows a block diagram of a wide-area field prescription system.In FIG. 4, ground data 405 and satellite data 410 are inputs to adatabase 429 and processor 430 (which may be part of a computer system).The output from the database and processor is a field prescription 435;i.e., a plan detailing how much chemical application is needed tooptimize yield from a farm field. A field prescription may be visualizedas a map showing when, where and how much fertilizer or pesticide isrequired on a field. The prescription may be used by an automatedapplication system such as a spray truck with dynamically controllablespray nozzles.

Soil data 415, crop data 420 and climate data 425 may also be inputs tothe database 429 and processor 430 although not all of these data may beneeded for every application. All of the data sources 405 through 425,and other data not shown, are georeferenced. Each data point (soil type,crop type, climate history, NDVI from various sources, etc.) isassociated with a location specified in latitude and longitude or anyother convenient mapping coordinate system. The various data may besupplied at different spatial resolution. Climate data, for example, islikely to have lower spatial resolution than soil type.

Data inputs 405 through 425 are familiar to agronomists as inputs toplant yield potential algorithms. Database 429 and processor 430 arethus capable of generating wide-area field prescriptions based on any ofseveral possible plant models and algorithms. The ability to rundifferent hypothetical scenarios offers farmers a powerful tool toassess the risks and rewards of various fertilizer or pesticideapplication strategies. For example, a farmer might simulate theprogress of one of his fields given rainfall and growing degree dayscenarios representing average growing conditions and also growingconditions likely to occur only once every ten years. Furthermore, thefarmer may send a ground-based NDVI sensor to scan small parts of just afew of his fields frequently, perhaps once a week, for example. Thesesmall data collection areas may then be used to calibrate satellite datacovering a large farm. The resulting calibrated data provides the farmerwith more precise estimates of future chemical needs and reduces cropyield uncertainty.

It is rarely possible to obtain ground and satellite NDVI data measuredat the same time. If only a few days separate the measurements, theresulting errors may be small enough to ignore. However, better resultsmay be obtained by using a plant growth model to propagate data forwardor backward in time as needed to compare asynchronous sources. FIG. 5shows a block diagram of a method to combine satellite and ground dataacquired at different times.

In FIG. 5, ground data 505, e.g., NDVI obtained by a GreenSeeker, andsatellite data 510 are inputs to a plant growth model 515. Results fromthe model are used to generate an NDVI map 520 for any desired time.Most plants' growth is described approximately by a sigmoid function;the part of the sigmoid of interest to farmers is the main growth phasewhich is approximately exponential. Furthermore, for data not separatedtoo far in time, plants' exponential growth may be approximated by alinear growth model.

The use of a linear plant growth model to compare asynchronousground-based and satellite measurements of NDVI may be understood byreferring to FIGS. 6A and 6B that show a schematic graph of NDVI dataobtained at different times via different methods. In FIG. 6A NDVI isplotted versus time for a small area, for example a single data point ina farm field, or a small section of a field. NDVI measurements 605 and610 are obtained by a ground-based system at times t₁ and t₂respectively, while NDVI measurement 614 is obtained from a satelliteimage at a later time t₃. Satellite-derived data point 614 has a bias oroffset. The bias in data point 614 may be calculated by fitting line 620to ground-derived data points 605 and 610. The result is that the actualNDVI measured by the satellite at time t₃ (for the specific ground areaunder consideration in FIG. 6A) is represented by data point 616, thevalue of the function represented by line 620 at t₃. Of course, thelonger the interval between t₂ and t₃, the less confidence may be placedin linear extrapolation 620. However, the result is likely more accuratethan simply forcing data point 614 to have the same value as data point610, for example.

The situation plotted in FIG. 6B is similar to that of FIG. 6A exceptfor the order in which data is obtained. In FIG. 6B NDVI measurements625 and 635 are obtained by a ground-based system at times t₄ and t₆respectively, while NDVI measurement 628 is obtained from a satelliteimage at an intermediate time t₅. Satellite-derived data point 628 has abias or offset. The bias in data point 628 may be calculated by fittingline 640 to ground-derived data points 625 and 635. The result is thatthe actual NDVI measured by the satellite at time t₅ (for the specificground area under consideration in FIG. 6B) is represented by data point632, the value of the function represented by line 640 at t₅.

FIGS. 6A and 6B have been described in a simplified scenario in whichplant growth is assumed to be easily modeled as a function of time.However, it may be more realistic to express plant growth as a functionof heat input, represented for example by growing degree days sinceplanting. If the number of growing degree days per actual day does notchange (an idealized and somewhat unlikely scenario), then plant growthversus time or heat input will have the same functional form. Ingeneral, the time axis in FIGS. 6A and 6B may be replaced by a modelwhich may include heat input, moisture, rainfall, sunlight intensity orother data that affect growth rate.

It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the methodsdiscussed above in connection with FIGS. 5 and 6 may be generalized. Twomeasurement sources—ground and satellite sensors—measure the samequantity. One source provides absolute measurements while the otherincludes an unknown bias. A linear model may be used for the timeevolution of the measured quantity, NDVI. The situation is well suitedfor the application of a digital filter, such as a Kalman filter, toobtain an optimal estimate for NDVI. Relative measurements of NDVI overwide areas are calibrated by absolute measurements over smaller, subsetareas.

Sparse spatial NDVI sampling may be sufficient to calibrate wide-areasatellite data. More dense sampling is needed for smaller managementzones which are often associated with more rapidly varying topography,while less dense sampling is sufficient for larger management zoneswhich are often associated with flatter topography.

The wide-area agricultural and prediction systems and methods describedherein give farmers more precise and accurate crop information overwider areas than previously possible. This information may be combinedwith soil, climate, crop and other spatial data to generate fieldprescriptions using standard or customized algorithms.

Although many of the systems and methods have been described in terms offertilizer application, the same principles apply to fungicide,pesticide, herbicide and growth regulator application as well. Althoughmany of the systems and methods have been described as using aerialimages obtained from satellites, the same principles apply to imagesobtained from aircraft (airplanes, jets, and the like), helicopters,balloons, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and other aerial platforms.Aerial images may be captured from a high altitude platforms, likesatellites or high flying aircraft, such that a single overhead imageencompasses all or a large portion of a designated geographic area.Aerial images may also be captured by low flying platforms such that asingle overhead image encompasses only a small fraction of a designatedgeographic area. For example, a crop duster flying less than 50 feetabove a field may capture one or more (e.g., a series) of aerial imageswhile applying a treatment, with a single image encompassing only asmall portion of the geographic area of a field being treated, but anentire series of the captured images encompassing all or nearly all ofthe field being treated. Thus “aerial data” comprises data obtained fromone or more satellite, airplane, helicopter, balloon and UAV imagingplatforms. Similarly, “ground-based data” comprises data obtained fromsensors that may be mounted on a truck, tractor or other vehicle orobject that is land-bound, or that may be captured by a hand-held sensoror mobile device utilized by a human user. Although many of the systemsand methods have been described in terms of NDVI, otherreflectance-based vegetative indices may be used.

FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an example wide-area farming informationcollection and dissemination network 700, according to variousembodiments. In some embodiments, some aspects of network 700 may beutilized for monitoring and prediction (which includes synthesizing) asdescribed herein. As illustrated in FIG. 7, in some embodiments,processor 430 and database 429 may be part of or coupled with a computersystem 750. In FIG. 7, one or more reporting agents 710 (710-1 to 710-n)report farming related information regarding multiple farms which aredispersed from one another over a wide area such as across one or morecounties, states, countries, and/or continents.

In various embodiments, one or more mobile devices 701 communicate withdatabase 429 and processor 430 via communication network 715. Each ofmobile device(s) 701 is configured with a respective reporting agent710-1 disposed thereon for reporting farming related events and data todatabase 429 and processor 430. In various embodiments, mobile device(s)701 comprise handheld devices including, but not limited to, personaldigital assistants (PDAs), cellular telephones, smart phones, laptopcomputers, digital notebooks, digital writing pads, or the like whichare configured for permitting a user to enter, store, and/or transmitdata. The form factor of a mobile device is small enough that it ishand-holdable by a human user. Many mobile devices 701 are preconfiguredwith a GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) receiver, or mayreadily have one communicatively coupled thereto, forrecording/reporting a position of the mobile device 701. In someembodiments, mobile device(s) 701 communicate with database 429 andprocessor 430 via a wireless communication network (e.g., 715). However,it is recognized that mobile device(s) 701 can also communicate via awired network, or a combination of wired and wireless communicationlinks. A reporting agent 710-1 may comprise an application on a mobiledevice 701, an item or hardware communicatively coupled with a mobiledevice 701, or some combination. A single mobile device 701 may comprisemultiple reporting agents 710-1. Reporting agent(s) 710-1 can reportuser input data (such as by a farmer, agronomist, or other user) and/orreport sensor data regarding a crop and/or field that may be provided bya sensor of or coupled with a mobile device 701. Some examples of sensordata which may be reported by a reporting agent 710-1 include, but arenot limited to, one or more of: the moisture content of a harvestedcrop, the amount of crop harvested (e.g., being held in the grain tankof a harvester), the position of the mobile device 701 when collectingdata, and/or other data received from sensors coupled with the vehiclesuch as the NDVI levels described above.

In various embodiments, network 700 additionally or alternativelycomprises one or more vehicle monitor(s) 702 having respective reportingagents 710-2 disposed thereon. Vehicle monitor(s) 702 communicate withdatabase 429 and processor 430 via communication network 715. Again, inaccordance with various embodiments, vehicle monitor(s) 702 communicatewith database 429 and processor 430 via a wireless communication network(e.g., 715), or can be coupled with a wired communication network, or acombination of wired and wireless communication links. In accordancewith various embodiments, vehicle monitor(s) 702 are disposed uponground or aerial vehicles which are used for various operations in theplanting, monitoring, and harvesting of crops. Examples of vehiclesimplementing vehicle monitor(s) 702, include, but are not limited to,tractors, trucks, harvesters, earthmoving equipment, airplanes, cropdusting aircraft, helicopters, balloons, un-manned aerial vehicles(UAVs), etc. A single vehicle or vehicle monitor 702 may comprisemultiple reporting agents 710-2. In one embodiment, reporting agent(s)710-2 are coupled with or disposed as a part of a controller, or otherdata processing device disposed in a vehicle. As an example, manytractors and harvesters utilize a GNSS receiver and controller fordetermining the position of the vehicle, navigation, recording, andguidance and vehicle control. In some embodiments, reporting agent(s)710-2 may be coupled with or disposed as a portion of the controller forthe GNSS guidance and control of the vehicle. In general, reportingagent(s) 710-2 are used to record and/or report the position, condition,or activity of the respective vehicle upon which is it disposed. Thisinformation can also be derived from equipment operated by, or coupledwith a particular vehicle. Examples, of such equipment includes, but isnot limited to, ploughs, sprayers, planters, earthmoving implements suchas bulldozer blades or backhoe buckets, chemical storage tanks (e.g., offertilizers, herbicides, fungicide, pesticides, etc.), or otherimplements which can be coupled with a vehicle. Reporting agent(s) 710-2can also be used to report conditions of the vehicles with which theyare coupled. This can include operating parameters of the vehicle'sengine, the speed, location, and direction of travel of the vehicle,fuel status, identity of the vehicle's operator, etc. Reporting agent(s)710-2 can also report data regarding a crop such as the moisture contentof a harvested crop, the amount of crop harvested (e.g., being held inthe grain tank of a harvester), or other data received from sensorscoupled with the vehicle such as the NDVI levels described above. Inaccordance with various embodiments, an operator of a vehicle canmanually enter data which is conveyed by reporting agent(s) 710-2 suchas the type of fertilizer, pesticide, herbicide, fungicide or othertreatment being applied to a field, the crop varietal being planted, orother operation being performed such as NDVI monitoring of N-rich strip210.

In various embodiments, network 700 additionally or alternativelycomprises one or more fixed asset(s) 703 having respective reportingagents 710-3 disposed thereon. Fixed asset(s) 703 communicate withdatabase 429 and processor 430 via communication network 715. Again, inaccordance with various embodiments, fixed asset(s) 703 communicate withdatabase 429 and processor 430 via a wireless communication network(e.g., 715), or can be coupled with a wired communication network, or acombination of wired and wireless communication links. In accordancewith various embodiments, fixed asset(s) 703 comprise devices formonitoring various events and/or conditions associated with anagricultural operation. For example, fixed asset(s) 703 can comprise,but are not limited to, rainfall monitors, pump monitors, remote weathersensing stations, storage facilities (e.g., fuel, water, or chemicalstorage, storage of harvested crops, feed, seed, hay, etc.), waterallocation monitors, or other devices used to measure and gather metricsof interest to an agricultural operation. A single fixed asset 703 maycomprise multiple reporting agents 710-3.

In FIG. 7, network 700 further additionally or alternatively comprisesone or more computing devices (e.g., a personal computer (PC) such as PC704) having respective reporting agents 710-4 disposed thereon. In manyagricultural operations, farmer uses PC 704 to enter data which theyhave collected. For example, many farmers collect data at their farmincluding, but not limited to, local weather conditions, treatmentsapplied to fields such as fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides,fungicide, growth regulators, and harvest aids, crops planted, cropyields, fuel costs, equipment operational data, soil data, pest anddisease infestations, and the like. Such information may be input via aPC 704 or even via a mobile device 701. Often, the farmers will use dataanalysis techniques to determine long-term patterns, or to predictfuture performance and/or yields based upon similar conditions in thepast. As an example, some farmers perform a private soil analysis oftheir property in which soil samples are collected at regular intervals(e.g., every 100 meters) across their property and labeled to identifythe location from which they were collected. The collected samples arethen sent for analysis to determine the soil composition of the farmer'sproperty and variations in the soil composition across the farmer'sproperty. In so doing, the farmer can determine field management zonesas shown above with reference to FIG. 1. The granularity of determiningthe soil composition across the farmer's property is dependent upon thesampling interval used in the collection of soil samples.

It is appreciated that network 700 may additionally or alternativelyinclude one or more reporting agents 710-n, other than those describedabove, which communicate with database 429 and processor 430 to provideuser input or sensor collected farming information.

In order to comply with current environmental and agriculturalregulations, farmers may be required to monitor and report the locationand time when various applications such as fertilizers, herbicides,fungicides, pesticides, or other chemicals are applied to fields.Collection of information to support compliance and/or certification canbe particularly important on and around organic farms. For exampleorganic farming operations often have to monitor or limit application ofchemicals in the vicinity of their fields by third parties such as otherfarmers and highway road crews. Often, the farmers do not own theapplication equipment themselves and pay a third party, such as a cropdusting company or farmer's cooperative to apply the treatments. Thefarmer, the third party, or some other party may utilize a reportingagent 710 to manually or automatically report application offertilizers, herbicides, fungicide, pesticides, or other chemicals areapplied to fields. Reporting of this data may be coupled with reportingof other data, such as position data and/or timestamp data. Otherfarming information monitored by farmers and reported via a reportingagent 710 may pertain to, but is not limited to, one or more of: wateruse, soil erosion, crop disease, insect management, weed management, andoverall crop health. For example, a reporting agent 710 may reportmanually input/sensed information regarding one or more of: how muchwater is drawn from a canal or underground aquifer at a particularlocation; the type and location of weeds in a field; the type, location,and level of infestation of insects in a field; the location and levelof soil erosion in a field; and/or the type, location, and progressionof a crop disease in a field. While farmers often collect this data forprivate use, it is not typically collected in a useful manner fordistribution over a wider area.

In FIG. 7, database 429 and processor 430 is also coupled with publicdata sources 730 via communication network 715. Examples of public datasources 730 include, but are not limited to, public agronomists,government agencies, research institutions, universities, commoditiesmarkets, equipment suppliers, vendors, or other entities that whichcollect or generate data of interest to agricultural operations.

In FIG. 7, database 429 and processor 430 is also coupled with privatedata sources 740. Examples of private data sources 740 include privatefor-profit entities which collect and distribute data of interest toagricultural operations. For example, private companies which distributesatellite imagery such as TerraServer® can be contracted for a fee. Inaccordance with an embodiment, a farmer who has contracted with aprivate data source 740 can arrange to make that data available todatabase 429 and processor 430. In another embodiment, an account with aprivate data source 740 can be made by the operator of database 429 andprocessor 430. Some other private sources include seed producing/vendingcompanies, herbicide producing/vending companies, pesticideproducing/vending companies, fungicide producing/fending companies,fertilizer producing/vending companies, and/or farmers cooperatives.

It is noted that in some embodiments, mobile device(s) 701, vehiclemonitor(s) 702, and fixed asset(s) 703 can be coupled with PC 704 whichin turn stores the data collected by these devices and forwards the datato database 429 and processor 430. In some embodiments, one or more ofmobile device(s) 701, vehicle monitor(s) 702, and fixed asset(s) 703,and PC 704 are integrated into a network used by a farmer to monitor hisrespective agricultural operations. In accordance with one embodiment, awireless personal area network is used to communicate data betweenmobile device(s) 701, vehicle monitor(s) 702, fixed asset(s) 703, and PC704. However, it is noted that these components can be implemented inother wireless manners and/or in a wired communication network as well.In some embodiments, data may also be transferred via a removable datastorage device from a non-networked connected device to a networkeddevice (e.g., a device communicatively coupled with network 715) andthen to database 429 and processor 430 from the networked device. Datamay also be transferred to database 429 and processor 430 when one ofthe devices (e.g., mobile device 701) is connected with a data transferinterface or docking station that is coupled with communication network715.

In accordance with various embodiments, reporting agents 710-1, 710-2,and 710-3 are compliant with various software platforms. For example,reporting agents 710-1 may be compliant with the Java Platform,Micro-Edition (Java ME), the Windows Mobile® platform, or the like forfacilitating the use of handheld devices to report data, conditions, andevents pertinent to agricultural operations. In one embodiment, areporting agent 710 (710-1 to 710-n) periodically determines whetherdata has been collected which is to be forwarded to database 429 andprocessor 430. In accordance with one embodiment, a reporting agent 710(710-1 to 710-n) can be manually configured by a user to indicate whichtypes of data are to be conveyed to database 429 and processor 430, PC704, or another entity, as well as a polling interval to determine howoften to report this data. In another embodiment, a reporting agent 710(710-1 to 710-n) automatically forwards collected data when it isrecorded. For example, when an operator of mobile device 701 recordsdata and indicates that the data is to be saved, or forwarded, reportingagent 710-1 will automatically forward the data to database 429 andprocessor 430. As discussed above, the data will forwarded via awireless communication network (e.g., communication network 715). Inaccordance with various embodiments, a reporting agent 710 (710-1 to710-n) automatically appends additional data. For example, if mobiledevice(s) 701, vehicle monitor(s) 702, and fixed asset(s) 703 areequipped with a positioning device such as a GNSS receiver, or if adevice is located at a known fixed location, a reporting agent 710(710-1 to 710-n) automatically appends the position of the device in themessage conveying collected data to database 429 and processor 430.Furthermore, a timestamp can be appended to each message when themessage is sent.

In accordance with some embodiments, a reporting agent 710 (710-1 to710-n) initiates deleting data which has been transmitted to database429 and processor 430 in response to a message indicating that the datahas been received and stored in database 429. In some embodiments, areporting agent 710 (710-1 to 710-n) determines whether communicationswith communication network 715 have been established and toautomatically forward the data to database 429 and processor 430 when ithas been determined that communications have been established. Until theconfirmation message has been received, the data will be stored locallyon the respective device which has collected it. It is noted that areporting agent 710 (710-1 to 710-n) reports data to PC 704 and thereporting agent 710-4 operating thereon as well. For example, in such aconfiguration, reporting agents 710-1, 710-2, and 710-3 willautomatically forward collected data to PC 704 and automaticallyinitiate deleting the data from their respective devices in response toa message from PC 704 confirming that the data has been received.Reporting agent 710-4 of PC 704 will then be responsible for forwardingthe data to database 429 and processor 430 as described above.

In accordance with various embodiments, monitoring and predictionnetwork 700 facilitates gathering, sorting, and distributing datarelevant to agricultural operations based upon the participation offarmers over a wide area. In existing methods and systems, the datacollected by a farmer is typically used by that farmer, with theaddition of information from public sources such as the Department ofAgriculture, the National Weather Service, local agronomists, publishedresearch articles, etc. In some existing methods and systems, datacollected by an individual farmer may be utilized by another entity suchas a farm product producer/vendor (e.g., a seed producer/vendor).Additionally, the volume of information available makes it difficultunder existing methods and systems to sort through and find datarelevant to a particular farmer, especially given the limited computingresources many users privately own. However, as described herein,monitoring and prediction network 700 allows farmers, and other entitiesinvolved in agricultural operations, to gather, filter, and distributedata over a larger region in a timely manner. As an example, if aninfestation of pests or spread of disease occurs in one farm, thisinformation can be sent to database 429 and processor 430. Using otherdata such as weather patterns, crop types, crop maturity, and thereports of other farmers, a subscriber to the services provided bymonitoring and prediction network 700 can determine whether his farm indanger of the infestation or disease and can take timely action such asapplying treatments to the crops to prevent damage to his crops.

A subscriber to monitoring and prediction network 700 can alsoparticipate in the distribution of goods, services, inventories, andcommodities among other participants. For example, a farmer can reportan excess, or shortage, of a commodity or resource to other participantsin monitoring and prediction network 700. As will be described ingreater detail below, the data sent by reporting agents 710-1, 710-2,710-3, and 710-4 is stored in database 429. Aggregating agent 760accesses database 429 and filters the data (which comprises data fromnumerous users across a wide area) for information which is relevant toa particular user and or a particular field. Such filtering may be basedon one or more parameters, such as soil type, crop type, appliedproducts (e.g., herbicide, pesticide, fungicide, and/or fertilizer) seedtype, crop maturity, weather, etc. In accordance with variousembodiments, aggregating agent 760 automatically generates reports 770of requested information and alerts 780 based upon pre-determinedparameters.

Consider a report generating example, where a farmer or other userinputs parameters of a particular agricultural field (e.g., seed type,growing period, soil type, and weather for example) aggregating agent760 can filter data collected across a wide geographic area based onthose parameters for the particular agricultural field which are input.Data across the wide geographic area which is acquired from otheragricultural fields with common parameters to those input and filteredon are filtered out and aggregated into a report 760 that is relevant toparticular agricultural field. In this manner a farmer in Nebraska whoenters parameters for an agricultural field in Hamilton county, Nebraskamay receive a report which includes relevant data acquired from a firstagricultural field in Hall county Nebraska (a neighboring county),relevant data acquired from a second agricultural field in Iowa (aneighboring state), and relevant data acquired from a third agriculturalfield in Argentina (a separate country has similar parameters but anopposite growing season).

As an example of alert generating, a farmer may apply a treatment to afield which is incompatible with crops in adjacent fields owned by otherfarmers. Thus, if the treatment is carried by the wind to theneighboring farmer's fields, the neighbor's crops may be inadvertentlykilled off. This is especially problematic when crop dusting is used toapply treatments to fields as the potential for downwind distribution ofchemicals to neighboring fields is greatly increased. However, if bothfarmers are subscribed to monitoring and prediction network 700, thefarmer applying the treatment to his field can enter the location of thefield and the treatment being applied using, for example, reportingagent 710-2 disposed upon the vehicle applying the treatment. Thisinformation can be conveyed wirelessly using communication network 715to database 429 and processor 430. When database 429 and processor 430receives this information, it can access current weather conditions inthe area, as well as what crops are being grown in that area, anddetermine if there is a danger that the treatment being applied isharmful to crops growing downwind or crops growing in the field which isbeing/about to be treated. If it is determined that there is a danger ofdownwind contamination or danger to the crop in the field being treated,aggregating agent 760 can generate an alert 780 which is conveyed to thefarmer/third party applying the treatment to the field, to the vehicleapplying the treatment if they are in different locations, and/or to anyfarmers downwind from the treatment whose crops may be affected.Additionally, alert 780 can be generated and received in real time sothat the application of the treatment can be prevented from occurring.

Example Computer System(s)

FIG. 8 is a block diagram of an example computer system 750 with whichor upon which various systems, networks, and/or method embodimentsdescribed herein may be implemented. With reference now to FIG. 8, allor portions of some embodiments described herein are composed ofcomputer-readable and computer-executable instructions that reside, forexample, in computer-usable/computer-readable storage media of acomputer system. That is, FIG. 8 illustrates one example of a type ofcomputer (computer system 750) that can be used in accordance with or toimplement various embodiments which are discussed herein. It isappreciated that computer system 750 of FIG. 8 is only an example andthat embodiments as described herein can operate on or within a numberof different computer systems including, but not limited to, generalpurpose networked computer systems, embedded computer systems, serverdevices, client devices, various intermediate devices/nodes, stand-alonecomputer systems, cloud computing systems, handheld computer systems,multi-media devices, and the like. Computer system 750 of FIG. 8 is welladapted to having peripheral tangible computer-readable storage media802 such as, for example, a floppy disk, a compact disc, digitalversatile disc, other disc based storage, universal serial bus “thumb”drive, removable memory card, and the like coupled thereto. The tangiblecomputer-readable storage media is non-transitory in nature.

System 750 of FIG. 8 includes an address/data bus 804 for communicatinginformation, and a processor 430A coupled with bus 804 for processinginformation and instructions. As depicted in FIG. 8, system 750 is alsowell suited to a multi-processor environment in which a plurality ofprocessors 430A, 430B, and 430B are present. Conversely, system 750 isalso well suited to having a single processor such as, for example,processor 430A. Processors 430A, 430B, and 430B may be any of varioustypes of microprocessors. System 750 also includes data storage featuressuch as a computer usable volatile memory 808, e.g., random accessmemory (RAM), coupled with bus 804 for storing information andinstructions for processors 430A, 430B, and 430B. System 750 alsoincludes computer usable non-volatile memory 810, e.g., read only memory(ROM), coupled with bus 804 for storing static information andinstructions for processors 430A, 430B, and 430B. Also present in system750 is a data storage unit 812 (e.g., a magnetic or optical disk anddisk drive) coupled with bus 804 for storing information andinstructions. System 750 also includes an optional alphanumeric inputdevice 814 including alphanumeric and function keys coupled with bus 804for communicating information and command selections to processor 430Aor processors 430A, 430B, and 430B. System 750 also includes an optionalcursor control device 816 coupled with bus 804 for communicating userinput information and command selections to processor 430A or processors430A, 430B, and 430B. In one embodiment, system 750 also includes anoptional display device 818 coupled with bus 804 for displayinginformation.

Referring still to FIG. 8, optional display device 818 of FIG. 8 may bea liquid crystal device, cathode ray tube, plasma display device orother display device suitable for creating graphic images andalphanumeric characters recognizable to a user. Optional cursor controldevice 816 allows the computer user to dynamically signal the movementof a visible symbol (cursor) on a display screen of display device 818and indicate user selections of selectable items displayed on displaydevice 818. Many implementations of cursor control device 816 are knownin the art including a trackball, mouse, touch pad, joystick or specialkeys on alphanumeric input device 814 capable of signaling movement of agiven direction or manner of displacement. Alternatively, it will beappreciated that a cursor can be directed and/or activated via inputfrom alphanumeric input device 814 using special keys and key sequencecommands. System 750 is also well suited to having a cursor directed byother means such as, for example, voice commands. System 750 alsoincludes an I/O device 820 for coupling system 750 with externalentities. For example, in one embodiment, I/O device 820 is a modem forenabling wired or wireless communications between system 750 and anexternal network such as, but not limited to, the Internet.

Referring still to FIG. 8, various other components are depicted forsystem 750. Specifically, when present, a database 429, an operatingsystem 822, applications 824, modules 826, and data 828 are shown astypically residing in one or some combination of computer usablevolatile memory 808 (e.g., RAM), computer usable non-volatile memory 810(e.g., ROM), and data storage unit 812. In some embodiments, all orportions of various embodiments described herein are stored, forexample, as collected data in database 429, an application 824 and/or amodule 826 in memory locations within RAM 808, computer-readable storagemedia within data storage unit 812, peripheral computer-readable storagemedia 802, and/or other tangible computer-readable storage media. Forexample, aggregating agent 760 may be implemented as an application 824which includes stored instructions for accessing database 429 and forcontrolling operation of computer system 750.

Example Method(s) of Agricultural Monitoring

FIG. 9 is a flow diagram 900 of an example method of agriculturalmonitoring and prediction, according to various embodiments. Althoughspecific procedures are disclosed in flow diagram 900, embodiments arewell suited to performing various other procedures or variations of theprocedures recited in flow diagram 900. It is appreciated that theprocedures in flow diagram 900 may be performed in an order differentthan presented, that not all of the procedures in flow diagram 900 maybe performed, and that additional procedures to those illustrated anddescribed may be performed. All of, or a portion of, the proceduresdescribed by flow diagram 900 can be implemented by a processor orcomputer system (e.g., processor 430 and/or computer system 750)executing instructions which reside, for example, oncomputer-usable/readable media. The computer-usable media can be anykind of non-transitory storage that instructions can be stored on.Non-limiting examples of the computer-usable/readable media include butare not limited to a diskette, a compact disk (CD), a digital versatiledevice (DVD), read only memory (ROM), flash memory, and so on.

At 910 of flow diagram 900, in one embodiment, aerial data is obtained.The obtained aerial data represents relative measurements of anagricultural metric in a particular geographic area. The aerial data andthe relative measurements that it represents have an unknown bias. Suchaerial data may be communicated from a reporting agent on an aerialplatform (satellite, aircraft, etc.) or acquired from a stored locationin a public data source 730 or private data source 740.

At 920 of flow diagram 900, in one embodiment, ground-based data isobtained. The obtained ground-based data represents absolutemeasurements of the agricultural metric within the geographic area. Theground-based data may be obtained from a ground based reporting agent710 which is coupled with a ground-based source (e.g., mobile device701, vehicle monitor 702, fixed asset 703, and/or PC 704).

At 930 of flow diagram 900, in one embodiment, the ground-based data isused to calibrate the aerial data, thereby synthesizing absolutemeasurements of the agricultural metric in parts of the geographic areafrom the aerial data. The ground-based data which is used overlaps witha portion of the aerial data and the delta between overlapping portionscan be used to determine the bias of the aerial data and thus calibrateall of the aerial data.

At 940 of flow diagram 900, once calibrated, the synthesized absolutemeasurements are stored in a database with along with the ground-baseddata. Additionally, other farming data is stored in the same database(or a communicatively coupled database). The other farming data iscollected across a wide geographic area that is larger than thegeographic area represented by the ground-based data and may be largerthan the geographic area represented by the aerial data. For example,the geographic area represented by the aerial data may represent asingle field of 80 acres or perhaps several square miles, while the widegeographic area for which farming data has been collected may representan entire county, several counties, a state, several states, a country,several countries, a continent, or multiple continents. As describedabove, processor 430 can perform the calibrating and synthesizing, anddatabase 429 can be utilized for storage.

At 950 of flow diagram 900, in some embodiments, the method of flowdiagram 900 further includes filtering data collected across the widegeographic area based on attributes common with those of a particularagricultural field in order to generate a report relevant to theparticular agricultural field. For example the synthesized absolutemeasurements may be for a particular field, and one or more parametersassociated with the particular field or another field may be utilized tofilter and aggregate relevant data (which shares one or more of theseparameters) from various other, different agricultural fields across thewide geographic area represented by data stored in database 429. Asdescribed above, this filtering of data and aggregating it into a report770 may be performed by aggregating agent 760. A report 770 may bepresented in any of a variety of formats. In one non-limiting example, areport 750 may spatially represent the aggregated data on a visualrepresentation (e.g., a line drawing, map, or image) of the particularfield. In another non-limiting example, a report 770 may presentaggregated data in a multi-column form such as with a latitude in firstrow of a first column, a longitude in a first row of a second column,and aggregated data associated with this latitude and longitudeappearing in first rows of additional columns (with aggregated data forother coordinates similarly presented in a corresponding fashion inother respective rows of these columns).

At 960 of flow diagram 900, in some embodiments, the method of flowdiagram 900 further includes combining data representing theground-based and synthesized absolute measurements with additionalspatial agricultural data to generate a prescription for the applicationof chemicals to an agricultural field. As previously describe, such afield prescription may be generated by processor 430 from data stored indatabase 429.

Example GNSS Receiver(s)

FIG. 10, shows an example GNSS receiver 1000 in accordance with oneembodiment. It is appreciated that different types or variations of GNSSreceivers may also be suitable for use in the embodiments describedherein. In some embodiments, a GNSS receiver such as GNSS receiver 1000may be coupled with or disposed as a portion of a reporting agent 710.

As illustrated in FIG. 10, received L1 and L2 signals are generated byat least one GPS satellite. Each GPS satellite generates differentsignal L1 and L2 signals and they are processed by different digitalchannel processors 1052 which operate in the same way as one another.FIG. 10 shows GPS signals (L1=1575.42 MHz, L2=1227.60 MHz) entering GNSSreceiver 1000 through a dual frequency antenna 1032. Antenna 1032 may bea magnetically mountable model commercially available from TrimbleNavigation of Sunnyvale, Calif. Master oscillator 1048 provides thereference oscillator which drives all other clocks in the system.Frequency synthesizer 1038 takes the output of master oscillator 1048and generates important clock and local oscillator frequencies usedthroughout the system. For example, in one embodiment, frequencysynthesizer 1038 generates several timing signals such as a 1st (localoscillator) signal LO1 at 1400 MHz, a 2nd local oscillator signal LO2 at175 MHz, an SCLK (sampling clock) signal at 25 MHz, and a MSEC(millisecond) signal used by the system as a measurement of localreference time.

A filter/LNA (Low Noise Amplifier) 1034 performs filtering and low noiseamplification of both L1 and L2 signals. The noise figure of GNSSreceiver 1000 is dictated by the performance of the filter/LNAcombination. The downconvertor 1036 mixes both L1 and L2 signals infrequency down to approximately 175 MHz and outputs the analogue L1 andL2 signals into an IF (intermediate frequency) processor 1050. IFprocessor 1050 takes the analog L1 and L2 signals at approximately 175MHz and converts them into digitally sampled L1 and L2 inphase (L1 I andL2 I) and quadrature signals (L1 Q and L2 Q) at carrier frequencies 420KHz for L1 and at 2.6 MHz for L2 signals respectively. At least onedigital channel processor 1052 inputs the digitally sampled L1 and L2inphase and quadrature signals. All digital channel processors 1052 aretypically are identical by design and typically operate on identicalinput samples. Each digital channel processor 1052 is designed todigitally track the L1 and L2 signals produced by one satellite bytracking code and carrier signals and to from code and carrier phasemeasurements in conjunction with the microprocessor system 1054. Onedigital channel processor 1052 is capable of tracking one satellite inboth L1 and L2 channels. Microprocessor system 1054 is a general purposecomputing device which facilitates tracking and measurements processes,providing pseudorange and carrier phase measurements for a navigationprocessor 1058. In one embodiment, microprocessor system 1054 providessignals to control the operation of one or more digital channelprocessors 1052. Navigation processor 1058 performs the higher levelfunction of combining measurements in such a way as to produce position,velocity and time information for the differential and surveyingfunctions. Storage 1060 is coupled with navigation processor 1058 andmicroprocessor system 1054. It is appreciated that storage 1060 maycomprise a volatile or non-volatile storage such as a RAM or ROM, orsome other computer readable memory device or media. In one roverreceiver embodiment, navigation processor 1058 performs one or more ofthe methods of position correction.

In some embodiments, microprocessor 1054 and/or navigation processor1058 receive additional inputs for use in refining position informationdetermined by GNSS receiver 1000. In some embodiments, for example,corrections information is received and utilized. By way of non-limitingexample, such corrections information can include differential GPScorrections, RTK corrections, and/or wide area augmentation system(WAAS) corrections.

Section 2: Water Erosion Management Incorporating Topography, Soil Type,and Weather Statistics

Preventing, or minimizing, the effects of erosion and topsoil runoff arecritical to the success of farming operations. For example, the topsoilgenerally hosts the highest concentrations of nutrients, organic matter,and microorganisms in a field. As a result, many plants concentratetheir roots, and obtain most of their nutrients, from this region of thesoil. When this layer of topsoil is washed away due to erosion, or blownaway due to winds, this vital layer of nutrients is not available forcrops. In extreme cases, the land is no longer able to support plantlife. Furthermore, riverbeds, creeks, and lakes can become congestedwith unwanted silt. In addition to topsoil loss, surface runoff ofrainwater can wash nutrients such as applied fertilizers, as well asherbicides, fungicides, and insecticides into watershed areas. This canresult in unwanted effects such as algae blooms which kill fish, plants,and other animals. Additionally, other uses of the watershed, such asrecreational activities or supplying potable water, can be adverselyaffects by the runoff of these chemicals. In addition to soil erosionand topsoil runoff, in some places of a farmer's field, insufficientdrainage may occur. As a result, too much water may be retained in thefarmer's field, or a sub-region of a particular field. This can make itmore difficult to operate agricultural machinery, delay operations suchas planting or harvesting, or make that particular area unsuited forplanting a particular crop.

In accordance with various embodiments, methods of water erosionmanagement are disclosed. FIG. 11 is a flow diagram 1100 of an examplemethod of water erosion management, according to various embodiments.Although specific procedures are disclosed in flow diagram 1100,embodiments are well suited to performing various other procedures orvariations of the procedures recited in flow diagram 1100. It isappreciated that the procedures in flow diagram 1100 may be performed inan order different than presented, that not all of the procedures inflow diagram 1100 may be performed, and that additional procedures tothose illustrated and described may be performed. All of, or a portionof, the procedures described by flow diagram 1100 can be implemented bya processor or computer system (e.g., processor 430 and/or computersystem 750) executing instructions which reside, for example, oncomputer-usable/readable media. The computer-usable media can be anykind of non-transitory storage that instructions can be stored on.Non-limiting examples of the computer-usable/readable media include butare not limited to a diskette, a compact disk (CD), a digital versatiledevice (DVD), read only memory (ROM), flash memory, and so on.

In operation 1110, a topographical datum is received indicating thetopography of a defined area. In accordance various embodiments,topographical data can be collected from a variety of sources, which maybe referred to as “reporting sources.” For example, referring again toFIG. 7, processor 430 and/or database 429 can receive topographical datafrom reporting sources such as, but not limited to, mobile device(s)701, vehicle monitor(s) 702, public data sources 730, private datasources 740, or other sources which are configured to detect, collect,or report topographical data. In some embodiments, a reporting agent 710may transmit or allow access of the topographical data of a reportingsource. In some embodiments, these reporting sources may provide thetopographical data as a part of or in conjunction with capturing andproviding absolute measurements of one or more agricultural metrics.Such reporting sources may also transmit or provide access to one ormore of soil composition data 1320, weather data 1330, user input 1340,and subscriber data 1350.

Receipt of topographical data is shown again in FIG. 13 wheretopographical data 1310 is received by computer system 750. As oneexample, referring now to FIG. 12 a farmer can traverse a defined areasuch as a field (e.g., field 1201 of FIG. 12. In one embodiment, thefarmer can be walking across field 1201 in one or more linear passessuch as shown by paths 1210-1, 1210-2, 1210-3 . . . 1210-n. In otherwords, simply by walking across field 1201 with mobile device 701, afarmer can generate in an ad-hoc manner topographic data 1310 which canbe used later to generate a topographic map of field 1201.Alternatively, the farmer could make a series of stops at discreet sitessuch as shown by sites 1220-1, 1220-2, 1220-3 . . . 1220-n. In oneembodiment, the farmer could be holding or carrying mobile device 701which is configured with a GNSS receiver such as GNSS receiver 1000 ofFIG. 10. In one embodiment, GNSS receiver 1000 periodically determinesthe position of mobile device 701 such as when the farmer is traversingfield 1201. This can be performed as a dedicated effort on the part ofthe farmer to collect topographic data 1310 which will be used later togenerate a topographic map (e.g., model 1370 of FIG. 13) of field 1201.This can also be performed simultaneously with or as a result ofcollection of other information, such as collection of absolutemeasurements of various agricultural metrics.

In one embodiment, the determination of the position of GNSS receiver1000 includes determining its elevation. Thus, as the farmer traversesfield 1201, GNSS receiver can generate a plurality of data points whichcan be used to develop a topographic map of field 1201. Morespecifically, a plurality of data points describing the elevation ofGNSS receiver 1000, as well as its position, can be collected, stored,and sent using mobile device 701. Thus, in one embodiment, topographicdata 1310 comprises position data as well as an elevation which iscorrelated with the position data. Alternatively, the same data can becollected when a farmer traverses field 1201 using, for example, a pieceof agricultural machinery. In one embodiment, a vehicle monitor 702 candevelop data points describing the elevation of GNSS receiver 1000, aswell as its position, when a farmer is driving across field 1201, suchas when plowing, applying a treatment, or harvesting a crop at field1201. In one embodiment, mobile device 701 and/or vehicle monitor 702performs this function in a manner which does not require manualintervention by a respective user. As an example, when a farmerregisters with wide-area farming information collection anddissemination network 700, configuration information can be sent tomobile device 701, vehicle monitor 702, or other devices, whichconfigures them to collect this information in a manner which istransparent to the operator of these devices. In one embodiment, whentraversing field 1201, GNSS receiver 1000 is generating a continuous, ornear continuous, stream of topographical data points which include theposition and elevation of GNSS receiver at a given time. It is furthernoted that traversing the field can be performed in other patterns thanshown in FIG. 12 such as in a grid pattern, etc.

In another embodiment, GNSS receiver 1000 generates the topographic datapoints including position and elevation of GNSS receiver 1000 at aparticular time, at discreet sites as shown by points 1220-1, 1220-2,1220-3 . . . 1220-n. As an example, a farmer can traverse field 1201 andcollect soil samples at points 1220-1, 1220-2, 1220-3 . . . 1220-n. Itis increasingly common for farmers to collect soil samples at regularintervals (e.g., every 100 meters) across their fields, which are thensent for analysis. The analysis of the soil samples tells the farmerwhat the soil composition is at each point where the samples were taken.This permits developing a detailed mapping of soil composition across adefined area such as field 1201. In one embodiment, a farmer can usemobile device 701, or vehicle monitor 701 to generate the position datawhich describes where each soil sample was taken. In one embodiment,when GNSS receive 1000 is used to generate a position fix (e.g., inresponse to a user action, it also automatically derives the elevationat that point as well. Referring again to FIG. 12, a farmer collectssoil samples at sites 1220-1, 1220-2, 1220-3 . . . 1220-n. The farmeruses GNSS receiver 1000 to determine the position of sites 1220-1,1220-2, 1220-3 . . . 1220-n for use in the soil analysis. In oneembodiment, GNSS receiver 1000 also collects the elevation at each ofthese sites as well. The position and elevation data can be stored in anelectronic file and sent, as topographic data 1310, via communicationnetwork 715 as it is collected. In another embodiment, the position andelevation data can be manually recorded by the farmer and later sent tocomputer system 750. It is noted that in one embodiment, the collectionof topographic data, including position and elevation data, occurssimultaneous with the collection of soil samples used to determine soilcomposition. In another embodiment, these operations can occur atdifferent times, or can be derived from separate sources.

In one embodiment, a model generator (e.g., model generator 1360 of FIG.13) of computer system 750 accesses the topographic data 1310 anddevelops a 3-D map (e.g., model 1370) which conveys the contours offield 1201 based upon the received position and elevation datacomprising topographic data 1310. It is appreciated that processor 420may be provided with instructions to implement model generator 1360, insome embodiments. It is noted that other sources of topographical data1310 can be used to develop model 1370 described above including, butnot limited to, survey data, or similar data received from public datasource 730 and/or private data source 740.

In operation 1120, data is received indicating a soil composition foundat the defined area. As discussed above, in one embodiment, a farmer cancollect soil samples at intervals across a defined area such as field1201. In another embodiment, soil samples may be collected in anothermanner. For example, one or more electromagnetic induction sensors whichcan sense conductivity, may be utilized for mapping relative differencesin soil characteristics in an agricultural field. An example of such assensor is the EM38 sensor from Geonics Limited of Ontario, Canada. Suchan electromagnetic sensor relies on detecting induced electric currentsat depth in response to a magnetic field. The strength of the inducedcurrents is determined by the electrical conductivity of the soil, oftendriven by the moisture profile in the soil matrix. Data logged from anelectromagnetic sensor at various locations in a field can be utilizedto map soil composition for the field. In some embodiments, a reportingagent 710 is coupled with such an electromagnetic induction sensor forautomatic reporting of collected soil composition data. Using these soilsamples and knowing the position at which each soil sample was taken,model generator 1360 can include in model 1370, data showing the soilcomposition of field 1201. It is noted that model 1370 also shows howsoil composition varies at different locations of field 1201.Furthermore, using the soil samples collected, for example, every 100yards permits developing this information with a greater degree ofgranularity than is possible using many other sources of soilcomposition data such as government databases. For example, a governmentdatabase is not typically configured to provide this level ofgranularity shown in model 1370 because of the time, effort, and moneyrequired to develop the data to this level of detail. Additionally,because of topographic changes within a field, soil composition maychange. For example, sand and fine silt may collect in low-lying areasof a farmer's field due to it being conveyed in runoff. Thus, the topsof hills and ridges may have a higher composition of clay than areas ofa field at the base of these terrain features which have a higherpercentage of sand and silt. However, this may not be reflected in thesoil composition maps retained at the federal, state, or county levelswhich typically map soil composition with much less detail.

In operation 1130, a model is created predicting water runoff patternsfor the defined area based upon the topography of the defined area andthe soil composition at the defined area. In one embodiment, modelgenerator 1360 generates one of more model(s) 1370 which predicts waterrunoff patterns from field 1201 based upon the topography of field 1201and the soil composition of field 1201. As noted above, model 1370 showshow soil composition varies at different locations of field 1201. Inaccordance with various embodiments, soil composition as well as thesteepness of terrain found at field 1201, is used to develop model 1370.

Furthermore, model generator 1360 can access weather data (e.g., weatherdata 1330 of FIG. 13) in the development of model 1370. In accordancewith various embodiments, weather data 1330 comprises historic weatherdata and/or predicted weather data. Weather data 1330 can be obtainedfrom public sources such as the National Weather Service, or fromprivate sources. One example of a private source of weather data 1330 isweather records maintained by the owner of field 1201. Another exampleof a private source of weather data 1330 is data collected by otherfarmers who live in the region of field 1201 and who have provided thatdata to wide-area farming information collection and disseminationnetwork 700. Using this data, model generator 1360 can include in model1370 a prediction of water runoff patterns at field 1201 based upon theavailable data. Model 1370 can also predict soil erosion, flooding, orother effects at field 1201 based upon the topographic data, soilcomposition, and weather data. For example, model 1370 can utilizehistoric rain fall data associated with various time periods, includingbut not limited to: several recent years (e.g., the most recent 5 yearperiod); a time period of historic drought; a time period of historicwetness; a time period of historically high rainfall (e.g., a one daymaximum; a one week maximum; rain fall associated with a 25, 50, or 100year flood event; and the like). Other data can include overlandflooding data, crop damage due to high winds, fire, or other events. Inone embodiment, other farmers who also subscribe to wide-area farminginformation collection and dissemination network 700 can provideobserved data which correlates soil composition, topographic data, andobserved precipitation data. This facilitates adjusting the predictedwater runoff patterns which are generated by model generator 1360 tomore accurately model real-world conditions.

Thus, wide-area farming information collection and dissemination network700 can provide a farmer a tool which is used to predict water runoffconditions at a defined area based upon topography, soil composition,and real, or hypothetical weather patterns. In one embodiment, userinput 1340 of FIG. 13 permits a user to input other data such asexisting land features, vegetation, and the like which change thetopographic data of model 1370. As an example, a farmer can interactwith model generator 1360 using mobile device 701, or PC 704 to changevariables which are used to generate model 1370. For example, a farmercan change the topographic data of model 1370 to predict how waterrunoff conditions are affected by various terraforming operations. Forexample, a farmer can change the topography of model 1370 to level somehills and fill some low-lying areas. Based upon the changed topographicdata and soil composition which results from these proposed operations,model generator 1360 will generate a new model 1370 which predicts thewater runoff conditions which will result. Other operations which can berepresented by model generator 1360 include, but are not limited to, theeffects of installing drainage, sub-surface drainage, irrigation,changing the size, location, or course of existing water features,effects of planted vegetation on water runoff and erosion, etc. Again,changes to model 1370 can be based in part upon data (e.g., subscriberdata 1350 of FIG. 13) from other subscribers to wide-area farminginformation collection and dissemination network 700 who haveimplemented or observed similar conditions on their property.

As a result, model generator 1360 permits a user to determine whatactions to take to minimize erosion and/or control water runoff patternson their property. Furthermore, model generator can access constructiondata which indicates or estimates the cost of various activities a usercan model. For example, model 1370 can include information showing thatit is estimated to cost $10,000 for a farmer to perform proposedterraforming operations on field 1201. This facilitates a cost/benefitsanalysis of various actions to determine not only whether the proposedterraforming operation will result in a desired outcome, but whether itis economically sound to perform a given terraforming operation.

In one embodiment, wide-area farming information collection anddissemination network 700 can also generate alerts 780 which can warn afarmer of potentially dangerous situations. For example, computer system750 can access model 1370 and current weather predictions to determineif, for example, flooding will occur based upon projected rainfall inthe next 72 hours. Knowing the terrain conformation of field 1201 andthe soil composition at various sites across field 1201, computer system750 can predict the capacity for the soil at field 1201 to absorbpredicted rainfall within a given period. This prediction can be mademore accurate by leveraging existing knowledge of other variables suchas the current moisture content of the soil at field 1201, or of pastflooding events which occurred under similar circumstances. As anotherexample, computer system 750 can use data regarding flood levelsupstream and/or downstream of field 1201, as well as the topographicdata 1310 and soil composition data 1320, to predict whether floodingand/or erosion will occur at field 1201.

Section 3: Crop Treatment Compatibility

Various crop treatments may be applied to crops and fields by a varietydifferent types crop treatment applicators. Some examples of croptreatment applicators include, but are not limited to: mounted sprayers,toying device and trailed (towed) sprayers, self-propelled sprayers(e.g., Hagie type sprayers), and aerial sprayers (e.g., sprayplanes/crop dusting aircraft), and combination applicators (i.e., atractor with a mounted applicator towing a towed sprayer). Some examplesof crop treatments include herbicides, fungicides, insecticides, andfertilizers. In some instances a particular crop treatment may not becompatible with application to a crop growing in a field where it is tobe applied. In some instances a particular crop treatment may not becompatible with a crop growing in a bordering field to the field wherethe crop treatment is to be applied. For example, some field crops arebred or engineered with resistance to certain herbicides while othersare not. Similarly, some field crops are unaffected by some selectiveherbicides, while others will be killed by the same selective herbicide.With respect to bordering fields, occasionally a crop treatment maymigrate or drift (either in the air or in the soil) from the field whereit is applied and a bordering field. If an incompatible crop treatmentis applied to a crop results can include decreased yield and possibledeath/total loss of the crop. Various techniques, methods, systems, anddevices, as described herein, may assist in ensuring compatibility ofcrop treatments with the crops that they are applied to and/or withcrops growing in neighboring fields (such as the fields which border afield where a crop treatment is to be applied).

In discussion herein, for convenience, many examples will be illustratedwith reference to a broad spectrum herbicide crop treatment. However, itis appreciated that these are only examples and the illustrated systemsmethods and devices also encompass utilization with other croptreatments. Broad spectrum herbicides include non-selective andselective herbicides. Some examples of broad spectrum herbicidesinclude, but are not limited to: glyphosate (utilized, for example, inthe Roundup® line of herbicides), which is a non-selective herbicide;glufosinate (utilized, for example, in some Basta®, Rely®, Finale®,Ignite®, Challenge® and Liberty® lines of herbicides), which is anon-selective herbicide; and 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, which is aselective herbicide commonly referred to as “2,4-D.”

FIG. 14 illustrates an example crop treatment applicator 1400 in aplanted field 105, in accordance with various embodiments. Croptreatment applicator 1400 comprises a tractor 1410 coupled with a towedsprayer 1420. It is appreciated that the description with respect tocrop treatment applicator 1400 is extensible to and equally applicableto other types of crop applicators, such as aerial crop applicators,mounted crop applicators, combination applicators, and self-propelledcrop applicators, to name several. As depicted, towed sprayer 1420 iscontrolled from tractor 1410. Tractor 1410 comprises one or more vehiclemonitor(s) 702 having respective reporting agents 710-2 disposedthereon. It is appreciated that such a vehicle monitor 702 and/orreporting agent 710-2 may be additionally or alternatively be coupledwith towed sprayer 1420. Vehicle monitor 702 is coupled with tractorcontrol bus 1412 and can receive and communicate information via tractorcontrol bus 1412. Vehicle monitor 702 is also coupled with or includes aGNSS receiver (e.g., GNSS receiver 1000) for determining a real-timelocation (e.g., latitude/longitude) 1460 of crop treatment applicator1400. Various offsets may be applied to determine a real-time locationof any portion of crop treatment applicator 1400. As has been previouslydescribed herein, vehicle monitor 702 communicates with database 429and/or processor 430 via communication network 715. This communicationcan comprise providing a real-time location of crop treatment applicator1400, information such as a description of the type of crop treatment1430 resident in crop treatment applicator 1400 (e.g., glyphosateherbicide), and whether or not crop treatment initiation mechanism 1411is in an on or off position. In some embodiments, an operator of croptreatment applicator 1400 may manually input information, such as via auser-interface of reporting agent 710-2, which is also communicated todatabase 429 and/or processor 430. An example of manually inputinformation may be a description of crop treatment 1430 (e.g., “holdingtank 1421 is filled with Roundup Ultramax™ herbicide”). In otherembodiments, a sensor, such as sensor 1422, in crop treatment applicator1400 automatically determines the nature of crop treatment 1430 (e.g.,type of herbicide, fungicide, insecticide, or fertilizer) and providessuch descriptive information about crop treatment 1430 to reportingagent 710-2.

Crop treatment 1430 is resident in a holding tank 1421 of crop treatmentapplicator 1400, and can be applied in a spray 1440 to planted crop 1450when an operator engages crop treatment initiation mechanism 1411. Croptreatment initiation mechanism 1411 may be a switch or other interlockwhich, when actuated to an “on” position causes crop treatment 1430 toflow and be discharged as spray 1440, and when deactuated to an “off”position causes flow of crop treatment 1430 to cease and discharge ofspray 1440 to cease. In some embodiments, crop treatment initiationmechanism 1411 is communicatively coupled with a control bus 1412 oftractor 1410 such that when actuation signal or deactuation signalindicating the state of crop treatment initiation mechanism 1411 istransmitted on control bus 1412. Such signal(s) may be routed to acontrol system associated with tractor 1410 and/or with crop treatmentapplicator 1400. The signal(s) may also be received by vehicle monitor702 and serve as a trigger to reporting agent 710-2, such that inresponse to actuation or deactuation of crop treatment initiationmechanism 1411, reporting agent 710-2 transmits one or more of areal-time location of crop treatment applicator 1400, a description ofcrop treatment 1430, and/or on/off state of crop treatment initiationmechanism 1411 to database 429 and/or processor 450.

In some embodiments, reporting agent 710-2 may receive an “enableapplication command” or a “disable application command” transmittedwirelessly as a signal from computer system 750 via communicationnetwork 715. An enable application command is passed on to vehiclemonitor 702 and may either serve as a second of two enable signalsrequired to initiate spray 1440. For example, a control system of croptreatment applicator 1400 may require actuation of crop treatmentinitiation mechanism 1411 and an enable signal from vehicle monitor 702,before initiation of spray 1440 and thus application of crop treatment1430. Similarly, a disable application command may be passed fromreporting agent 710-2 to vehicle monitor 702. Vehicle monitor 702 thensends a disabling signal on bus 1412 to cause spray 1440 to cease or toprevent initiation of spray 1440, thus disabling application of croptreatment 1430.

FIG. 15 shows a schematic of nine farm fields 101-109, according tovarious embodiments. For purposes of example, these are the same ninefarm fields illustrated in FIG. 1. The location or positional bounds offields 101-109 are known or stored in database 429. Location 1460 isshown in the Northwest corner of field 105. Arrow 1505 indicates adirection of wind across field 105, which may be reported to computersystem 750 as part of weather data 1330. Weather data 1330 may includeother information such as the speed of the wind, the temperature, and aforecast for the odds of precipitation in a region encompassing field105.

Example Crop Treatment Compatibility System(s)

FIG. 16 is a block diagram of an example crop treatment compatibilitysystem 1600, in accordance with various embodiments. System 1600includes a computer system 750 with a processor 430. Computer system 750includes or is coupled with database 429 (although depicted in FIG. 16as being a part of computer system 750, database 429 may reside in oneor more locations remote from computer system 750 and be communicativelycoupled with processor 430). Computer system 750 further includes croptreatment compatibility determiner 1660 and crop treatment actioninitiator 1670, either or both of which may be implemented as hardware,a combination of hardware and firmware, or a combination of hardware andsoftware. In some embodiment, as illustrated, one or more of croptreatment compatibility determiner 1660 and crop treatment actioninitiator 1670 may be implemented by processor 430 from instructionsaccessed from a computer-readable medium.

Computer system 750, wireless communication network 715, reporting agent710, processor 430, and database 429 have been previously described andoperate in a manner consistent with previous description, withdifferences and additions identified below. In some embodiments, (asdepicted) processor 430 may implement one or more of aggregator 760and/or model generator 1360 (and/or other components described herein)in addition to implementing crop treatment compatibility determiner 1660and/or crop treatment action initiator 1670.

Reporting agent 710 may be coupled with a crop treatment applicator andreport treatment information that is automatically or manually gatheredat the location of the crop treatment applicator. For example, reportingagent 710-2, as illustrated in FIG. 14, is coupled with crop treatmentapplicator 1400 and reports crop treatment information 1605 to computersystem 750 and crop treatment compatibility determiner 1660.

Database 429 includes planted crop information 1665 for a plurality ofplanted fields. For example, with reference to FIG. 15, planted cropinformation 1665 for fields 101-109 may reside in database 429. Otherinformation for these and other fields may be stored in database 429. Iffor example, a crop treatment is to be applied to field 105, database429 thus includes planted crop information 1665 for field 105 and alsoincludes planted crop information 1665 for one or more surroundingfields (101, 102, 103, 104, 106, 107, 108, 109) which border field 105.Planted crop information 1665 may be populated in database 429 by anymeans, including, but not limited to: user input 1640, automated inputfrom a reporting agent 710, and/or by accessing public and private datasources such as government crop surveys and crop insurance databases.Planted crop information 1665 may include, among other information, thetype of the crop, the age of the crop, genetic traits of the crop,and/or growing restrictions applicable to the crop. The type of the croprefers to the type of plant/seed that is being grown, some examples ofdifferent crop types include, but are not limited to: corn, wheat,soybeans, rice, cotton, canola, sunflower, sugarbeet, oats, spelt,sorghum, fescue, and alfalfa. Genetic traits, often referred to as“traits,” include selectively bred and genetically engineered traits.Some examples of traits with applicability to crop treatmentcompatibility include, but are not limited to: glyphosate resistance(often referred to as RoundupReady®); and glufosinate resistance (oftenreferred to as LibertyLink®). The age of the crop may be determined fromthe day of planting, day of sprouting, or day of known or estimatedgermination of the planted crop. Growing restrictions may includerestrictions such as no use of pesticides, or no use of any manmade croptreatments. Growing restrictions are often associated with organic cropsand may also be associated with fields where organic crops are grown orwill be grown.

Crop treatment compatibility determiner 1660 receives crop treatmentinformation 1605 related to a crop treatment applicator and determinesif a crop treatment is compatible with a field in which the croptreatment applicator is located or in which the crop treatment will beapplied.

Crop treatment information 1605 is received from sources such as userinput 1640 (e.g., an electronic work order for an applicator to apply aparticular crop treatment in a particular field/location). Such userinput may be via a computer, personal digital assistant, smartphone,etc. Reporting agent 710 may also supply crop treatment information1605, such as from an operator of a crop treatment applicator orautomatically from a crop treatment applicator. Crop treatmentinformation 1605 includes one or more of: a real-time location (e.g., aGNSS location) of a crop treatment applicator; a scheduled location ofcrop treatment application (such as from a work order); and adescription of a crop treatment resident in the crop treatmentapplicator.

Crop treatment compatibility determiner 1660 makes a compatibilitydetermination by accessing, from database 429, planted crop information1665 for a field which encompasses the real-time location of the croptreatment applicator, and then evaluating the planted crop information1665 and the crop treatment resident in the crop treatment system forcompatibility based upon one or more stored crop treatment compatibilityrules 1667. Such crop treatment compatibility rules 1667 may be storedin database 429, crop treatment compatibility determiner 1660, or anylocation where they can be accessed as needed.

Some non-limiting examples of crop treatment compatibility rules 1667include: 1) 2,4-D containing herbicide is incompatible with applicationto soybeans; 2) 2,4-D containing herbicide is compatible withapplication to fescue; 3) 2,4-D containing herbicide is compatible withapplication to corn; 4) glyphosate containing herbicide is incompatiblewith application to any crop which does not possess a glyphosateresistant trait; 5) glyphosate containing herbicide is compatible withapplication to any crop which possesses a glyphosate resistant trait; 6)glufosinate containing herbicide is incompatible with any planted cropwhich does not possess a glufosinate resistance trait; 7) glufosinatecontaining herbicide is compatible with any planted crop which possessesa glufosinate resistance trait; 8) no herbicide is compatible withapplication to a certified organic planted crop; 9) no herbicide iscompatible with application within 100 feet of a certified organicplanted crop; 10) analyze compatibility for bordering planted fieldsthat are downwind of a field where a crop treatment is being, or is tobe, applied when prevailing wind is greater than 5 miles per hour andrelative humidity is greater than 75%; 11) analyze compatibility forbordering planted fields that are downwind of a field where a croptreatment is being, or is to be, applied when prevailing wind is greaterthan 12 miles per hour; 13) compare real-time location with availablework order information to determine if real-time location is compatiblewith scheduled location of crop treatment application.

It is appreciated that other embodiments may use other compatibilityrules 1667, which may or may not include some or all of these examplecompatibility rules 1667. Compatibility rules 1667 may also be includedor utilized for other crop treatments such as pesticides, fungicides,and fertilizers. Compatibility rules 1667 may take into account the ageof a planted crop to determine if a crop treatment is being appliedwithin a treatment window for which that crop treatment is compatible.Crop age is used to determine the lifecycle stage that a planted crop isin at any particular time, as some crop treatments which may normally becompatible with a planted crop may be incompatible at certain lifecyclestages such as before or during germination, or during pollination. Forexample, it may be desirable to apply fungicide to corn only beforepollination to prevent yield loss. Likewise, application of apre-emergent herbicide may only be compatible after a planted crop hasgerminated.

One or more crop treatment compatibility rules 1667 may be applied bycrop treatment compatibility determiner 1660 to determine compatibilityof a crop treatment with a field in which it is to be applied (or inwhich it is being applied). One or more crop treatment compatibilityrules 1667 may also be applied by crop treatment compatibilitydeterminer 1660 to determine compatibility of a crop treatment with afield which borders a field in which a crop treatment is to be applied(or in which it is being applied). One output of crop treatmentcompatibility determiner 1660 is a compatible/not compatibledetermination based on the application of one or more crop treatmentcompatibility rules 1667 to a planted field which encompasses areal-time location of a crop treatment applicator. Another output ofcrop treatment compatibility determiner, in some embodiments, is acompatible/not compatible determination based on the application of oneor more crop treatment compatibility rules 1667 to one or more borderingplanted fields which border or surround the planted field whichencompasses a real-time location of a crop treatment applicator. Suchcompatibility/non-compatibility determinations are provided to croptreatment action initiator 1670 which may initiate one or more actions1680 based on the compatibility determination for a planted field whichencompasses the real-time location of the crop treatment applicator, orfor one or more planted fields which border that planted field.

Crop treatment action initiator 1670 is a part of computer system 750and is coupled with crop treatment compatibility determiner 1660. Croptreatment action initiator 1670 initiates, in real-time (in severalseconds or less of receiving crop treatment information at computersystem 750), one or more crop treatment actions 1680. Actions 1680 maybe implemented, for example, in real-time from computer system 750 inresponse to the crop treatment compatibility/incompatibilitydetermination that is made for a planted field in which a crop treatmentis being applied or will be applied, or for one or more planted fieldswhich border that planted field. Compatibility actions (e.g., enableapplication command 1680-1, planted field compatibility notification1680-3, bordering field compatibility notification 1680-5 are threenon-limiting examples) may be initiated in response to a compatibilitydetermination, while incompatibility actions (disable applicationcommand 1680-2, planted field incompatibility notification 1680-4, andbordering field incompatibility notification 1680-6 are threenon-limiting examples) may be initiated in response to anincompatibility determination. It is appreciated that some entities suchas farmers or owners of fields may sign up as recipients of such actions1680 and/or provide crop treatment information 1605 and/or planted cropinformation 1665 to computer system 750 in order to achieve reductionsin crop insurance rates and/or improve peace of mind. Similarly, otherentities such as crop treatment application companies and operators ofcrop treatment applicators may sign up as recipients of such actions1680 and/or provide crop treatment information 1605 to computer system750 to improve accurate delivery of crop treatment, to reduce liability,and/or to decrease insurance/bonding costs. Other entities such as cropinsurance companies may sign up for receipt of certain actions 1680and/or provide planted crop information 1665 in an effort to reduce cropinsurance risk.

As example of initiating one or more planted field incompatibilityactions, consider a situation where crop treatment applicator 1400 islocated at location 1460 (in planted field 105) and crop treatmentcompatibility determiner 1660 determines that crop treatment 1430 is notcompatible with application to the planted crop in field 105. In thissituation, a disable application command 1680-2 may be sent to reportingagent 710-2. An owner of field 105 may also be text messaged a plantedfield incompatibility notification 1680-4, as a warning. An example ofsuch a text message is “A glyphosate containing herbicide is about to besprayed on corn in field 105 and this planted crop does not have aglyphosate resistant trait and is therefore not compatible withapplication of this herbicide.” Another example of a crop treatmentincompatibility action is an email message to a crop treatment companysuch as “Crop treatment applicator is in field 105 attempting to apply acrop treatment, which a work order has listed as scheduled for fieldapplication in field 102.” Such incompatibility actions may be performedin isolation or in combination, in various embodiments.

As an example of initiating one or more planted field compatibilityactions, consider a situation where crop treatment applicator 1400 islocated at location 1460 (in planted field 105) and crop treatmentcompatibility determiner 1660 determines that crop treatment 1430 iscompatible with application to the planted crop in field 105. In thissituation, a crop treatment compatibility action such as texting aplanted field compatibility notification 1680-3 to an owner of a plantedfield 105 is initiated, in real-time, in response to a determination bycrop treatment compatibility determiner 1660 that a crop treatment 1430is compatible with application to planted crop. An example of such atext message is “2-4,D is about to be sprayed on planted fescue in field105 and this planted crop is compatible with application of thisherbicide.” In some embodiments, an enable application command 1680-1may also be sent to reporting agent 710-2 of crop treatment applicator1400. Such compatibility actions may be performed in isolation or incombination, in various embodiments.

Crop treatment action initiator 1670 may initiate a bordering fieldincompatibility action 1680-6, in real-time, in response to croptreatment compatibility determiner 1660 determining that the croptreatment for planted field 105 is not compatible with at least one ofthe bordering planted fields to planted field 105. As an example ofinitiating an incompatibility action for a bordering field, consider asituation where crop treatment applicator 1400 is located at location1460 (in planted field 105) and crop treatment compatibility determiner1660 determines that crop treatment 1430 is incompatible withapplication to the planted crop in field 104. An example of a borderingfield crop treatment incompatibility action 1680-6 is placing anautomated phone call to an owner of bordering field 104 stating “2-4,Dis about to be sprayed on field 105 and this herbicide is not compatiblewith soybeans planted in field 104 which is downwind from field 105.”Another example of a bordering field crop treatment incompatibilityaction 1680-6 is sending a pager message to an operator of croptreatment applicator 1400 stating “An herbicide is about to be sprayedin field 105, and this is incompatible with being sprayed within 100feet of certified organic oats planted in field 102.” In someembodiments, crop treatment action initiator may send a disableapplication command 1680-2 to reporting agent 710-2 in response todetermining that application of a crop treatment in a first field isincompatible with planted crops in a bordering field. Variousincompatibility actions, with respect to a bordering field, may be takenin isolation or in combination in one or more embodiments.

Crop treatment action initiator 1670 may initiate a bordering fieldcompatibility action 1680-5, in real-time, in response to crop treatmentcompatibility determiner 1660 determining that the crop treatment forplanted field 105 is compatible with at planted crops in all of thebordering planted fields to planted field 105. As an example ofinitiating a compatibility action for a bordering field, consider asituation where crop treatment applicator 1400 is located at location1460 (in planted field 105) and crop treatment compatibility determiner1660 determines that crop treatment 1430 is compatible with applicationto all known planted crops in field 101, 102, 103, 104, 106, 109, 110(or for some subset of the bordering fields for which planted cropinformation is accessible by computer system 750). An example of abordering field crop treatment compatibility action 1680-6 is placing ansending an email message to an owner of bordering field 104 stating “Aglyphosate containing herbicide is about to be sprayed on a planted cropin field 105 and this herbicide is compatible with the glyphosateresistant trait of the soybeans planted in field 105.” Variouscompatibility actions, with respect to a bordering field, may be takenin isolation or in combination in one or more embodiments.

While FIG. 16 illustrates a variety of actions 1680 which may beavailable in one or more embodiments; however, in other embodiments, amore limited set or more extensive set of actions 1680 may be available.A more limited set of actions 1680 or more extensive set of actions 1680may include only a subset of the illustrated actions 1680-1 to 1680-6.For example, in one or more embodiments, a more limited set actions 1680may include only planted field incompatibility notification 1680-4 fromthe illustrated actions 1680-1 to 1680-6. Other subsets of theillustrated actions 1680-1 to 1680-6 may be available in otherembodiments.

Example Method(s) of Ensuring Crop Treatment Compatibility

FIGS. 17A and 17B illustrate a flow diagram 1700 of an example method ofensuring crop compatibility, according to various embodiments. Althoughspecific procedures are disclosed in flow diagram 1700, embodiments arewell suited to performing various other procedures or variations of theprocedures recited in flow diagram 1700. It is appreciated that theprocedures in flow diagram 1700 may be performed in an order differentthan presented, that not all of the procedures in flow diagram 1700 maybe performed, and that additional procedures to those illustrated anddescribed may be performed. All of, or a portion of, the proceduresdescribed by flow diagram 1700 can be implemented by a processor orcomputer system (e.g., processor 430 and/or computer system 750)executing instructions which reside, for example, oncomputer-usable/readable media. The computer-usable/readable media canbe any kind of non-transitory storage media that instructions can bestored on. Non-limiting examples of the computer-usable/readable mediainclude, but are not limited to a diskette, a compact disk (CD), adigital versatile device (DVD), read only memory (ROM), flash memory,and so on.

At 1710 of flow diagram 1700, in one embodiment, crop treatmentinformation is received at a computer system. As described above, thiscan comprise receiving crop treatment information 1605 at computersystem 750, processor 430, and/or crop treatment compatibilitydeterminer 1660. Crop treatment information 1605 comprises a real-timelocation of a crop treatment applicator and description of a croptreatment resident in the crop treatment applicator. It is appreciatedthat one or both of the real-time location and the description of theresident crop treatment may be received from a reporting agent 710 thatis coupled with a crop treatment applicator 1400. One or more aspects ofcrop treatment information 1605 may also be received in the form of areported work order for a crop treatment applicator 1400 and/or via userinput 1640 of a farmer, owner of a field, crop treatment applicationcompany, or operator of crop treatment applicator 1400.

At 1720 of flow diagram 1700, in one embodiment, planted cropinformation 1665 is accessed for a planted field which encompasses thereal-time location supplied as part of crop treatment information 1605.In one embodiment, crop treatment compatibility determiner 1660requests, receives, or retrieves such planted crop information 1665 fromdatabase 429 or other location. The planted crop information 1665comprises a description of a planted crop in a field with a knownlocation. Planted crop information 1665 describes at least a type ofcrop seed planted in the planted field (e.g., wheat seed, corn seed,soybean seed, etc.). In some embodiments, the planted crop information1665 may also describe a trait of the crop seed or lack of a trait ofthe crop seed. In some embodiments, the planted crop information 1665may also describe an age of the planted crop.

At 1730 of flow diagram 1700, in one embodiment, a determination is madeas to whether or not the crop treatment resident in the crop treatmentapplicator is compatible with application to the planted crop that isplanted in the field which is encompasses the reported location of thecrop treatment applicator. In one embodiment, crop treatmentcompatibility determiner 1660 makes this determination. Thisdetermination can be made after crop treatment compatibility determiner1660 evaluates the planted crop information 1665 and the crop treatment1430 resident in crop treatment applicator 1400 for compatibility basedupon one or more stored compatibility rules 1667. Numerous non-limitingexamples of such compatibility rules 1667 have previously been given andreference is made thereto.

At 1740 of flow diagram 1700, in one embodiment, in response todetermining the crop treatment resident in the crop treatment applicatoris not compatible with application to the planted crop in the fieldwhich encompasses the reported location of the crop treatmentapplicator, a crop treatment incompatibility action is initiated. Insome embodiments, the crop treatment incompatibility action is initiatedin real-time, from the computer system that has received crop treatmentinformation 1605. In some embodiments, crop treatment action initiator1670 initiates one or more actions 1680 that are associated with croptreatment incompatibility. Such actions can include sending a disableapplication command 1680-2 and/or sending a planted fieldincompatibility notification 1680-4. The crop treatment incompatibilitynotification 1680-4 may be sent by any electronic means (e.g., phonecall, voice mail, text message, facsimile message, pager message, e-mailmessage, etc.) to an entity such as an owner of the planted field, afarmer of the planted field, an operator of the crop treatmentapplicator, a crop treatment application company, a crop insurancecompany, and/or a reporting agent 710 coupled with the crop treatmentapplicator. In one embodiment, sending a real-time disable applicationcommand 1680-2 to a reporting agent, such as reporting agent 710-2,which is coupled with a control system and/or control bus of the croptreatment applicator 1400 (such as through a vehicle monitor 702),causes the control system to disable application of crop treatment 1430.

At 1750 of flow diagram 1700, in one embodiment, the method as describedin 1710-1740 further includes initiating a crop treatment compatibilityaction in response to determining the crop treatment is compatible withthe planted crop. In some embodiments, the crop treatment compatibilityaction is initiated in real-time from computer system that has receivedcrop treatment information 1605. In some embodiments, crop treatmentaction initiator 1670 initiates one or more actions 1680 that areassociated with crop treatment compatibility. Such actions can includesending an enable application command 1680-1 and/or sending a plantedfiled compatibility notification 1680-3. The crop treatmentcompatibility notification 1680-3 may be sent by any electronic means(e.g., phone call, voice mail, text message, facsimile message, pagermessage, e-mail message, etc.) to an entity such as an owner of theplanted field, a farmer of the planted field, an operator of the croptreatment applicator, a crop treatment application company, a cropinsurance company, and/or a reporting agent 710 coupled with the croptreatment applicator. In one embodiment, sending a real-time enableapplication command 1680-1 to a reporting agent, such as reporting agent710-2, which is coupled with a control system and/or control bus of thecrop treatment applicator 1400 (such as through a vehicle monitor 702),causes the control system to enable application of crop treatment 1430.

At 1760 of flow diagram 1700, in one embodiment, the method as describedin 1710-1740 further includes accessing planted crop information 1665for one or more bordering planted fields to the planted field in which acrop treatment is being, or is to be, applied. Bordering fields arethose fields which border the field that encompasses the real-timelocation supplied as part of crop treatment information 1605. Forexample, if field 105 encompasses the real-time location, then fields101, 102, 103, 104, 106, 107, 108, and 109 would be considered borderingfields. In one embodiment, crop treatment compatibility determiner 1660requests, receives, or retrieves such planted crop information 1665 fromdatabase 429 or other location. The planted crop information 1665, for abordering field, comprises a description of a planted crop in a fieldwith a known location. Planted crop information 1665, for a borderingfield, describes at least a type of crop seed planted in the borderingplanted field (e.g., wheat seed, corn seed, soybean seed, etc.). In someembodiments, the planted crop information 1665, for a bordering field,may also describe a trait of the crop seed or lack of a trait of thecrop seed. In some embodiments, the planted crop information 1665, for abordering planted field, may also describe an age of the planted crop inthe bordering planted field.

At 1770 of flow diagram 1700, in one embodiment, the method as describedin 1760 further includes determining if application of the croptreatment in the planted field is compatible with one or more borderingplanted fields. This comparison is based at least on planted crops ofthe one or more bordering planted fields. In one embodiment, croptreatment compatibility determiner 1660 makes this determination. Thisdetermination can be made after crop treatment compatibility determiner1660 evaluates the planted crop information 1665 for the one or morebordering planted fields and the crop treatment 1430 resident in croptreatment applicator 1400 for compatibility based upon one or morestored compatibility rules 1667. Numerous non-limiting examples of suchcompatibility rules 1667 have previously been given and reference ismade thereto.

At 1780 of flow diagram 1700, in some embodiments, the method of flowdiagram 1770 further includes in response to determining the croptreatment is not compatible with at least one of the bordering plantedfields, initiating a bordering field crop treatment incompatibilityaction. In some embodiments, the bordering field crop treatmentincompatibility action is initiated in real-time, from the computersystem that has received crop treatment information 1605. In someembodiments, crop treatment action initiator 1670 initiates one or moreactions 1680 that are associated with bordering field crop treatmentincompatibility. Such actions can include sending a disable applicationcommand 1680-2 and/or sending a bordering planted filed incompatibilitynotification 1680-6. The bordering field crop treatment incompatibilitynotification 1680-6 may be sent by any electronic means (e.g., phonecall, voice mail, text message, facsimile message, pager message, e-mailmessage, etc.) to an entity such as an owner of the planted field, afarmer of the planted field, an owner of the bordering planted field, afarmer of the bordering planted field, an operator of the crop treatmentapplicator, a crop treatment application company, a crop insurancecompany, and/or a reporting agent 710 coupled with the crop treatmentapplicator. In one embodiment, sending a real-time disable applicationcommand 1680-2 to a reporting agent, such as reporting agent 710-2,which is coupled with a control system and/or control bus of the croptreatment applicator 1400 (such as through a vehicle monitor 702),causes the control system to disable application of crop treatment 1430.

The method of flow diagram 1770 may further include in response todetermining that the crop treatment is compatible with all of thebordering planted fields (or at least all of the bordering plantedfields for which planted crop information is accessible), initiating abordering field crop treatment compatibility action. In someembodiments, the bordering field crop treatment compatibility action isinitiated in real-time, from the computer system that has received croptreatment information 1605. In some embodiments, crop treatment actioninitiator 1670 initiates one or more actions 1680 that are associatedwith bordering field crop treatment compatibility. Such actions caninclude sending an enable application command 1680-1 and/or sending abordering planted filed compatibility notification 1680-5. The borderingfield crop treatment compatibility notification 1680-5 may be sent byany electronic means (e.g., phone call, voice mail, text message,facsimile message, pager message, e-mail message, etc.) to an entitysuch as an owner of the planted field, a farmer of the planted field, anowner of the bordering planted field, a farmer of the bordering plantedfield, an operator of the crop treatment applicator, a crop treatmentapplication company, a crop insurance company, and/or a reporting agent710 coupled with the crop treatment applicator. In one embodiment,sending a real-time enable application command 1680-1 to a reportingagent, such as reporting agent 710-2, which is coupled with a controlsystem and/or control bus of the crop treatment applicator 1400 (such asthrough a vehicle monitor 702), causes the control system to enableapplication of crop treatment 1430.

Section 4: Exchanging Water Allocation Credits

Increasingly, the allocation of scarce resources is a concern fordeveloped, and developing, nations. As an example, growing populationsand urbanization are necessitating intervention in order to allocatewater resources between agricultural and municipal water users. As thepopulations of cities grow, there is an increased need for water fordrinking, sewage, industrial, and recreational use. As a result, thereis less water available for agricultural use unless the water supply canbe increased. Furthermore, the increased population requires more food.Often, to cope with this increased demand agricultural operations areexpanded to more arid regions which require irrigation in order tosupport crops. Additionally, as cities expand, they often take overpreviously arable land for urban use, further driving the need forirrigation. As a result, the need for increasing the allocation of waterfor agricultural purposes competes with the increased need of cities tosupport their populations.

Typically, for irrigation purposes farmers pay up-front for their yearlywater allocations from a water source. For example, a farmer will pay atthe beginning of some annual period for an allocation of 10,000 cubicmeters of water from a watershed water source which provides water forirrigating the farmer's field. If the farmer needs additional waterabove his yearly allocation during a period of low rainfall, the farmerwill pay extra for that water. However, during periods of excessrainfall, the farmer may not need to draw all of his allocated waterfrom the watershed water source. The farmer is not compensated forallocated water which is not drawn from the watershed water source. As aresult, the farmer has paid for an asset which is not needed or used inthat growing season.

In accordance with various embodiments, wide-area farming informationcollection and dissemination network 700 can be used to monitor,aggregate, and broker the sale or exchange of water allocation creditbetween users. In one embodiment, fixed assets 703 comprise pumps, orother devices such as flow meters or monitor, which provide or monitorwater delivered to a home, farm, industrial operation, etc. Reportingagent 710-3 automatically monitors and/or reports the amount of waterwhich is pumped by fixed asset 703, or which flows past reporting agent710-3. In one embodiment, reporting agent 710-3 is automatically storesthis information locally. Additionally, reporting agent 710-3, in someembodiments, automatically forwards information related to waterallocation, such as the amount of water that has flowed past reportingagent 710-3, to aggregating agent 760. Alternatively, a farmer, or otherwater user, can collect the data from reporting agent 710-3 (e.g., usingreporting agent 710-1 of mobile device 701). In another example, afarmer can manually enter the data into PC 704 which reports the waterallocation data to aggregating agent 760 using reporting agent 710-4.

FIG. 18 is an example diagram of a watershed area 1800 in accordancewith various embodiments. A watershed area, such as watershed area 1850,may comprise any one or some combination of water sources such as ariver, canal, reservoir, aquifer, or the like. In FIG. 18, farms 1801,1802, and 1803 draw water from river 1850. For simplicity ofillustration and discussion, only river 1850 is discussed, howeverdiscussion with respect to river 1850 is equally applicable to otherwatershed water sources and combinations thereof. Further downstream,metropolitan area 1820 also draws water from river 1850. As shown inFIG. 18, farms 1801, 1802, and 1803 use reporting agents 710-3A, 710-3B,and 710-3C respectively for monitoring and reporting of water drawn fromriver 1850. In accordance with various embodiments, reporting agents710-3A, 710-3B, and 710-3C measure and report how much water a farmerhas drawn from a water source such as river 1850. This data is sent toaggregating agent 760 of computer system 750 which acts as a brokersystem for exchanging water allocation credits. For example, if farm1810 has received enough rainfall, it may not need all, or any, of itsallocated water. Thus, if a farmer has paid in advance for 10,000 cubicmeters of water, and only uses, or is projected to use, 2,000 cubicmeters of water, computer system 750 can act as a broker to farms 1802and 1803 which may be experiencing drier than anticipated rainfall andneed water in excess of the water allocation which has been paid for. Inaccordance with one embodiment, a farmer who needs additional water canuse the unused water allocation credit of another farmer who does notneed it. For example, if farm 1801 has excess water, it can sell waterallocation credits for the unused water allocation to farm 1803 which islocated downstream of farm 1801. Additionally, this can be done withoutreducing the supply of water to other entities downstream of farm 1803such as metropolitan area 1820. In another embodiment, the excess waterallocation credit from multiple subscribers to wide-area farminginformation collection and dissemination network 700 can be aggregatedand sold to another party. For example, the excess water allocationcredit from each of farms 1801, 1802, and 1803 may be too small to beindividually purchased by metropolitan area 1820. However, byaggregating the excess water allocation credits from farms 1801, 1802,and 1803 into a single, larger aggregated water allocation credit,wide-area farming information collection and dissemination network 700can act as a broker to sell that larger aggregated water allocationcredit to metropolitan area 1820.

In accordance with one embodiment, the data collection and reportingability of wide-area farming information collection and disseminationnetwork 700 can be leveraged to predict future precipitation projectionsand to send reports 770 to farmers (e.g., operators of farms 1801, 1802,and 1803) advising them that it is possible and/or advisable to sellsome of their water allocation credit to another party. Again, in oneembodiment, wide-area farming information collection and disseminationnetwork 700 can act as an agent or broker for selling excess waterallocation credit to another subscriber, or to another party. This canbe based upon knowledge of the soil, topography, crops, weatherpatterns, current water levels of lakes and rivers, and other data whichcan be accessed by wide-area farming information collection anddissemination network 700. This permits generating a prediction of howmuch water a particular user will require from a water source.

In accordance with various embodiments, wide-area farming informationcollection and dissemination network 700 can be used to determine acost/benefits analysis of drawing additional water from a water sourcein excess of the farmer's paid for water allocation. In some instances,farmers pay a higher rate when drawing additional water in excess oftheir normal water allocation. Again, wide-area farming informationcollection and dissemination network 700 can analyze the soil, weather,crops, and other variables, and generate a report 770 which describeswhether a higher crop yield will recoup the cost of drawing additionalwater from a water source.

FIG. 20 is a flow diagram of an example method 2000 of exchanging waterallocation credits in accordance with one embodiment. In operation 2010of FIG. 20, data is accessed describing a water allocation creditreserved for a first user. As described above, a farmer buys in advancethe right to draw water from a water source. Typically, the farmer doesnot draw all of the water he paid for at that time, but instead willdraw the water over an extended period such as the following year, orfollowing growing season. Thus, in exchange for the money paid by thefarmer, he receives water credits for drawing a given amount of waterwhich is allocated to him. As described above, wide-area farminginformation collection and dissemination network 700 can gatherinformation regarding various aspects of farming operations includingirrigation and water allocation credit data. In one embodiment, a farmercan report the volume, and price paid, for his yearly allocation ofwater from a water source such as river 1850. As shown in FIG. 19, afarmer (e.g., operating farm 1801 of FIG. 18) can report his yearlywater allocation as represented by water allocation 1901.

Wide-area farming information collection and dissemination network 700can compare agricultural data for farm 1801 with historical recordsand/or subscriber data from other subscribers (e.g., farms 1802 and1803) of wide-area farming information collection and disseminationnetwork 700. Examples of this data include, but are not limited to, soilcomposition data, weather data (e.g., current weather patterns andforecasts, as well as historical data records), crop data, and the like.Using this information, wide-area farming information collection anddissemination network 700 can make a prediction of the amount of waterwhich may be needed to meet a stated objective of the farmer. Forexample, the farmer could state a desired yield of crops per acre, acost per acre to grow a crop, or another parameter, which is used bywide-area farming information collection and dissemination network 700to predict how much water the farmer will need for that growing season.In one embodiment, wide-area farming information collection anddissemination network 700 can compare the agricultural data for thefarmer at farm 1801 with similar data from other subscribers to moreaccurately model and predict the yield for the farmer based upon, forexample, how much of a farmer's water allocation is needed or will beused to meet stated objective of the farmer. In another embodiment,wide-area farming information collection and dissemination network 700can generate a message which predicts the farmer's crop yield if thefarmer decides to sell his unused water allocation credit, or comparewhat additional gains in crop yield the farmer will realize for usingadditional amounts of the unused water allocation credit on his farm.

In operation 2020 of FIG. 20, an unused amount of the water allocationis determined which will not be used by the first user. As describedabove, wide-area farming information collection and disseminationnetwork 700 can be used to determine how much water (e.g., used waterallocation credit 1901A of FIG. 19) a farmer will need or use to meet astated objective of a farmer. Thus, in some instances, a farmer will notnecessarily need to use all of his water allocation for a given periodor growing season. As a result, wide-area farming information collectionand dissemination network 700 can determine an unused amount (e.g.,unused water allocation credit 1901B of FIG. 19) of a farmer's givenwater allocation based upon this analysis. In one embodiment, wide-areafarming information collection and dissemination network 700 willgenerate a message to a farmer stating that, while meeting the farmer'sstated objectives, some amount of the farmer's water allocation creditremains, or will remain, unused. Alternatively, wide-area farminginformation collection and dissemination network 700 may generate amessage stating that in order to meet another farmer's stated objective,more water than the farmer's current water allocation will be needed.Thus, a farmer can determine whether using more water allocation creditswill result in a higher yield, or if he will benefit more by selling theunused water allocation credits to another party. In one embodiment, areporting agent 710-3 coupled with a fixed asset 703 such as a pump, orflow meter of an irrigation system, can be used to report the actualamount of the allocated water a farmer has already used.

In operation 2030 of FIG. 20, the sale of the unused amount of the waterallocation credit to another user is brokered. In one embodiment,wide-area farming information collection and dissemination network 700can act as a broker for one, or a plurality of, subscribed users to sellgoods, services, and commodities such as water for irrigation purposes.In one embodiment, wide-area farming information collection anddissemination network 700 can be implemented in the role of a broker forselling water allocation credits. As an example, the farmer operatingfarm 1801 can sell, via wide-area farming information collection anddissemination network 700, unused water allocation credit 1901B to thefarmer(s) operating farms 1802 and/or 1803. Alternatively, wide-areafarming information collection and dissemination network 700 can act asa broker between a plurality of farmers (e.g., operating farms 1801 and1802) to another party. For example, in FIG. 18, the farmers operatingfarm 1801 and 1802 can, through aggregating agent 760, aggregate theirunused water allocation credits (e.g., 1901B and 1902 of FIG. 19) tocreate aggregated water allocation credit 1910. Wide-area farminginformation collection and dissemination network 700 can then act as abroker to sell aggregated water allocation credit 1910 to another party.For example, wide-area farming information collection and disseminationnetwork 700 can sell aggregated water allocation credit 1910 to anotherparty. The other party may be elsewhere in watershed area 1800 outsideof watershed area 1800. As one example, the other party to whichaggregated water allocation credit 1910 is sold may be downstream alongriver 1850, such as farm 1803, or metropolitan area 1820. According tovarious embodiments, wide-area farming information collection anddissemination network 700 can aggregate the credit for unused waterallocation credits, and broker their sale.

Section 5: Crop Characteristic Estimation

FIG. 21 is a block diagram of an example crop characteristic estimationsystem 2100, in accordance with various embodiments. System 2100includes a computer system 750 with a processor 430. Computer system 750includes or is coupled with database 429 (although depicted in FIG. 21as being a part of computer system 750, database 429 may reside in oneor more locations remote from computer system 750 and be communicativelycoupled with processor 430). Computer system 750 further includes plantgrowth model correlator 2160 and crop characteristic estimator 2165,either or both of which may be implemented as hardware, a combination ofhardware and firmware, or a combination of hardware and software. Insome embodiments, system 750 may further include one or more ofestimated crop characteristic map generator 2170 and harvest pathgenerator 2175, either or both of which may be implemented as hardware,a combination of hardware and firmware, or a combination of hardware andsoftware. In some embodiment, as illustrated, one or more of plantgrowth model correlator 2160, crop characteristic estimator 2165,estimated crop characteristic map generator 2170, and/or harvest pathgenerator 2175 may be implemented by processor 430 from instructionsaccessed from a computer-readable medium.

Computer system 750, wireless communication network 715, reporting agent710, processor 430, and database 429 have been previously described andoperate in a manner consistent with previous description, withdifferences and additions identified below. In some embodiments, (asdepicted) processor 430 may implement one or more components orfunctions described herein in addition to implementing any or all ofplant growth model correlator 2160, crop characteristic estimator 2165,estimated crop characteristic map generator 2170, and/or harvest pathgenerator 2175.

Reporting agents 710 (710-1, 710-2, 710-3, 710-4, etc.) may be coupledwith mobile device(s) 701, vehicle monitor(s) 702, fixed asset(s) 703,personal computer(s) 704, and other communication hardware. In oneembodiment, a reporting agent 710 coupled a combine provides actual cropcharacteristic data (ACCD) 2105 from a harvested field. Such cropcharacteristic data may be data such as yield (i.e., bushels per acremeasured at a plurality of locations in as a field is harvested),moisture content (i.e., a percentage of moisture content of a harvestedcrop measured at a plurality of locations as a field is harvested),protein content (i.e., percentage of protein contained in a harvestedcrop at a plurality of locations in a harvested field); and test weight.It is appreciated that modern combines are equipped to ascertain variouscrop characteristics such as one or more of yield, moisture content,protein content, and test weight, on-the-fly as a crop is beingharvested. This information may be recorded in a memory on-board thecombine and/or forwarded via communication network 715 to database 429by a reporting agent 710. Actual crop characteristic data may also beprovided to database 429 via one or more other sources, such as beingsent from a personal computer of a farmer following the harvest of afield, or being sent from a mobile device of a farmer, agronomist, seeddealer or the like who samples a crop at a particular location in afield and then performs tests on the sampled crop to determine one ormore items of crop characteristic data (e.g., moisture content %,protein content %, test weight, etc.).

In one embodiment, a user of system 2100, such as a farmer, customcutter, combine operator, or the like may provide a specified cropcharacteristic value (SCCV) 2110 as an input for use in generating aharvest path to harvest a crop which satisfies the specified cropcharacteristic value 2110. Such an input specified crop characteristic2110 is then forwarded to computer system 750 and harvest path generator2175 via communication network 715 by a reporting agent 710. Someexamples of specified crop characteristic value 2110 include, but arenot limited to: estimated yield within a specified value range;estimated yield at or below a specified value; estimated yield at orabove a specified value; estimated test weight within a specified valuerange; estimated test weight at or below a specified value; estimatedtest weight at or above a specified value; estimated moisture contentwithin a specified value range; estimated moisture content at or below aspecified value; estimated moisture content at or above a specifiedvalue; estimated protein content within a specified value range;estimated protein content at or below a specified value; estimatedprotein content at or above a specified value. It is understood thattest weight and moisture content are very closely related, however, someentities prefer using one term rather than the other to describe a unitof grain. In general, test weight is a commonly accepted measure ofquality used in the commercial exchange of bulk grain, while moisturecontent is a large sub-component in the overall test weight.

Database 429 includes planted crop information 1665 for a plurality ofplanted fields, plant growth models 515 for a plurality of fields, andactual crop characteristic data 2105 for a plurality of fields. It isappreciated that these data overlap. For example, database 429 willinclude planted crop information 1665, plant growth model information,and actual crop characteristic data 2105 for each of one or more fieldwhich have been planted, grown and harvested. Additionally, database 429may include NDVI maps 520, soil data 415, crop data 420, climate data425 and/or other information for various harvested and unharvestedfields.

Plant growth model correlator 2160 is communicatively coupled withdatabase 429. In one embodiment, plant growth model correlator 2160 isable to search database 429 to determine at least one harvested fieldwhich has a plant growth model that correlates with the plant growthmodel for at least a portion of an unharvested field. For example, iffield 102 of FIG. 1 has been harvested and has a plant growth modelwhich is available in database 429, plant growth model correlator 2160may determine that regions with an NVDI shade of 2 (see FIG. 3) withinmanagement zone 1 (see FIG. 1) of field 102 correlate in their modeledplant growth with portions of field 103 which have an NVDI shade of 2(see FIG. 3). Similarly, if field 104 of FIG. 1 has been harvested andhas a plant growth model which is available in database 429, plantgrowth model correlator 2160 may determine that regions with an NVDIshade of 1 (see FIG. 3) within management zone 1 (see FIG. 1) of field104 correlate in their modeled plant growth with portions of field 103which have an NVDI shade of 1 (see FIG. 3).

Crop characteristic estimator 2165, in one embodiment, estimates a cropcharacteristic (i.e., estimated crop characteristic data 2180) for anunharvested field based on actual crop characteristic data obtained fromat least one harvested field that has been correlated with theunharvested field. Such estimated crop characteristic data 2180 may beoutput from computer system 750 in an electronic form, such as a spreadsheet which links such estimated crop characteristics to locations(e.g., latitude/longitude) within an unharvested field. Such aspreadsheet would typically have at least three columns, one for theestimated crop characteristic data, one for a latitude, and one for alongitude. Other formats for providing estimated crop characteristicdata 2180 are possible and anticipated. Estimated crop characteristicdata 2180 may be forwarded via communication network 715 to anylocation/entity which can accept and display/utilize its content.

Following the previous example, if field 102 of FIG. 1 has beenharvested and has a reported a protein content of harvested wheataveraging 15% in regions with an NVDI shade of 2 (see FIG. 3) withinmanagement zone 1 (see FIG. 1) of field 102, then crop characteristicestimator 2165 will, in one embodiment, estimated that portions of field103 which have an NVDI shade of 2 (see FIG. 3) and a management zone of1 will also have a wheat protein content of 15%. Similarly, if field 104of FIG. 1 has been harvested and has a reported a protein content ofharvested wheat averaging 13% in regions with an NVDI shade of 1 (seeFIG. 3) within management zone 1 (see FIG. 1) of field 104, then cropcharacteristic estimator 2165 will, in one embodiment, estimated thatportions of field 103 which have an NVDI shade of 1 (see FIG. 3) and amanagement zone of 1 will also have a wheat protein content of 13%. Itis appreciated that other information may be taken into account inmaking crop characteristic estimates. Some examples of such otherinformation include, but are not limited to: growing days for thecorrelated fields, weather data for the correlated fields, and timesince harvest of the harvested field(s).

If field 102 of FIG. 1 has been harvested and has a reported a moisturecontent of harvested corn averaging 19% in regions with an NVDI shade of2 (see FIG. 3) within management zone 1 (see FIG. 1) of field 102, thencrop characteristic estimator 2165 will, in one embodiment, estimatedthat portions of field 103 which have an NVDI shade of 2 (see FIG. 3)and a management zone of 1 will also have a moisture content of cornwhich is at or below 19%. Similarly, if field 104 of FIG. 1 has beenharvested and has a reported a moisture content of harvested cornaveraging 17% in regions with an NVDI shade of 1 (see FIG. 3) withinmanagement zone 1 (see FIG. 1) of field 104, then crop characteristicestimator 2165 will, in one embodiment, estimated that portions of field103 which have an NVDI shade of 1 (see FIG. 3) and a management zone of1 will also have a moisture content of corn which is at or below 17%. Itis appreciated that other information may be taken into account inmaking crop characteristic estimates. Some examples of such otherinformation include, but are not limited to: growing days for thecorrelated fields, weather data for the correlated fields, and timesince harvest of the harvested field(s).

In another example, if field 102 of FIG. 1 has been harvested and has areported a test weight of harvested soybeans averaging 62 pounds/bushelin regions with an NVDI shade of 2 (see FIG. 3) within management zone 1(see FIG. 1) of field 102, then crop characteristic estimator 2165 will,in one embodiment, estimated that portions of field 103 which have anNVDI shade of 2 (see FIG. 3) and a management zone of 1 will also have atest weight for soybeans which is at or above 62 pounds/bushel.Similarly, if field 104 of FIG. 1 has been harvested and has a reporteda test weight of harvested soybeans averaging 55 pounds/bushel inregions with an NVDI shade of 1 (see FIG. 3) within management zone 1(see FIG. 1) of field 104, then crop characteristic estimator 2165 will,in one embodiment, estimated that portions of field 103 which have anNVDI shade of 1 (see FIG. 3) and a management zone of 1 will also have atest weight for soybeans which is at or above 55 pounds/bushel. It isappreciated that other information may be taken into account in makingcrop characteristic estimates. Some examples of such other informationinclude, but are not limited to: growing days for the correlated fields,weather data for the correlated fields, and time since harvest of theharvested field(s).

In another example, if field 102 of FIG. 1 has been harvested and has areported a yield of harvested barley averaging 85 bushels/acre inregions with an NVDI shade of 2 (see FIG. 3) within management zone 1(see FIG. 1) of field 102, then crop characteristic estimator 2165 will,in one embodiment, estimated that portions of field 103 which have anNVDI shade of 2 (see FIG. 3) and a management zone of 1 will alsoproduce an average of 85 bushels/acre for barley. Similarly, if field104 of FIG. 1 has been harvested and has a reported a yield of harvestedbarley averaging 70 bushels/acre in regions with an NVDI shade of 1 (seeFIG. 3) within management zone 1 (see FIG. 1) of field 104, then cropcharacteristic estimator 2165 will, in one embodiment, estimated thatportions of field 103 which have an NVDI shade of 1 (see FIG. 3) and amanagement zone of 1 will also have a yield for barley which is at orabove 70 bushels/acre. It is appreciated that other information may betaken into account in making crop characteristic estimates. Someexamples of such other information include, but are not limited to:growing days for the correlated fields, weather data for the correlatedfields, and time since harvest of the harvested field(s).

In one embodiment, estimated crop characteristic map generator 2170generates and outputs an estimated crop characteristic map 2185.Estimated crop characteristic map 2185 visibly illustrates and portraysthe estimated crop characteristic(s) relative to locations within anunharvested field.

FIG. 22 illustrates an example estimated crop characteristic map 2185Afor an unharvested field (field 103 of FIG. 1), according to one or moreembodiments. Region 2210 is illustrated as having a first estimated cropcharacteristic, while region 2220 is illustrated as having a second anddifferent estimated crop characteristic. Estimated crop characteristicmap 2185A, of FIG. 22 may be printed, electronically displayed, and/orprovided via communication network 715 to any location/entity which canaccept and display/utilize/output its content.

In one embodiment, harvest path generator 2175 generates a harvest path2190 for an unharvested field based on the estimated crop characteristicmap. For example, the harvest path 2190 may be generated to harvestcrops of a certain estimated crop characteristic separately from cropsof a differing estimated crop characteristic. In one embodiment, a usermay input or specify one or more items of information which are utilizedby harvest path generator 2175. Some examples of specified informationinclude a desired direction of harvest for hilled row crops (e.g., toprevent harvesting across the hills); a width of a combine head/numberof rows which a combine head can handle; and a specified cropcharacteristic value 2110 for which the harvest path 2190 is to begenerated. An example of a specified crop characteristic value 2110 maybe protein content above or below a value or within a range. Anotherexample of a specified crop characteristic value 2110 may be moisturecontent above or below a value or within a range. For example, a farmermay wish to generate a harvest path 2190 to harvest wheat with aspecified average protein content % in order to fulfill a contract whichrequires wheat at or above a certain protein content %. In another case,a farmer may which to generate a harvest path 2190 to harvest corn witha moisture content within a specified average moisture content % inorder to deliver the grain directly to a local cooperative without beingdocked in price for drying and shrinkage. In yet another case, a farmermay which to generate a harvest path 2190 to harvest soybeans with testweight above specified value in order to take advantage of a favorableprevailing market price for such a crop.

FIG. 23 illustrates an example of a harvest path 2190A generated for anunharvested field (field 103 of FIG. 1), according to one or moreembodiments. Harvest path 2190A of FIG. 23 is configured to harvest of aregion 2210 of a crop in the illustrated region of field 103 whichpossesses a particular estimated crop characteristic value that isdifferent from an estimated crop characteristic value of the cropsgrowing in region 2220. Of note, harvest path 2190A attempts to harvestonly region 2210 in an efficient manner while avoiding region 2220. Inone embodiment, harvest path 2190A is forwarded via communicationnetwork 715 to a steering control of a combine and utilized to autosteer the combine through field 103.

Example Method(s) of Crop Characteristic Estimation

FIGS. 24A, 24B, and 24C illustrate a flow diagram 2400 of an examplemethod of crop characteristic estimation, according to variousembodiments. Although specific procedures are disclosed in flow diagram2400, embodiments are well suited to performing various other proceduresor variations of the procedures recited in flow diagram 2400. It isappreciated that the procedures in flow diagram 2400 may be performed inan order different than presented, that not all of the procedures inflow diagram 2400 may be performed, and that additional procedures tothose illustrated and described may be performed. All of, or a portionof, the procedures described by flow diagram 2400 can be implemented bya processor or computer system (e.g., processor 430 and/or computersystem 750) executing instructions which reside, for example, oncomputer-usable/readable media. The computer-usable/readable media canbe any kind of non-transitory storage media that instructions can bestored on. Non-limiting examples of the computer-usable/readable mediainclude, but are not limited to a diskette, a compact disk (CD), adigital versatile device (DVD), read only memory (ROM), flash memory,and so on.

At 2410 of flow diagram 2400, in one embodiment, a database containingplant growth models for a plurality of fields is accessed. This cancomprise, for example, computer system 750 and/or plant growth modelcorrelator 2160 accessing database 429 to acquire or search plant growthmodels 515 and/or other crop related information available in database429.

At 2420 of flow diagram 2400, in one embodiment, at least one harvestedfield with a first plant growth model is determined which correlateswith a second plant growth model for at least a portion of anunharvested field. This can comprise, for example, computer system 750and/or plant growth model correlator 2160 accessing database 429 toacquire or search plant growth models 515 available in database 429. Thedetermination of a correlating harvested field may be based on recentdata (same growing season), historical data (past growing seasons), or acombination thereof. The correlation of the first and second plantgrowth models may be further based upon other factors, including, butnot limited to: a commonality of management zones between portions ofthe harvested and unharvested fields; correlation between growing daysbetween the harvested and unharvested fields; and/or correlation betweenweather data for the harvested and unharvested fields. In oneembodiment, a correlation may be found if items being correlatedcorrelate above some threshold, such as a statistical correlation ofbetween 0.75 and 1.0, a statistical correlation between 0.90 and 1.0, astatistical correlation between 0.95 and 1.0. Such correlations may bepreset and/or user defined. In general, certain correlations may need tobe stronger than others in order to achieve reliable estimations of cropcharacteristics. For example, in one embodiment, the correlation betweenmanagement zones of harvested and unharvested fields is required to bestronger than the correlation between plant growth models of the sameharvested and unharvested fields. For example, in one embodiment, in oneembodiment, the correlation between management zones of harvested andunharvested fields is required to be 1.0 while the correlation betweenplant growth models of the same harvested and unharvested fields isrequired to be 0.95 or higher. Other correlation ranges are possible andanticipated.

At 2430 of flow diagram 2400, in one embodiment, a crop characteristicfor the unharvested field is estimated based on actual cropcharacteristic data obtained from the at least one harvested field. Theestimated crop characteristic, in various embodiments, may be a yield,moisture content, protein content, test weight, or other cropcharacteristic that can be measured from the harvested crop. Thisestimation is performed, in one embodiment, by crop characteristicestimator 2165. In one embodiment, the estimate comprises estimatingcorrelated portions of the harvested and unharvested field to haveidentical crop characteristics. In other embodiments, the estimate canbe adjusted away from identical or specified as a range based on avariety of factors such as the strength of correlation, weather, growingdays, time since harvest, etc. For example, given a strong or identicalcorrelation between a harvested and unharvested field, estimations for acharacteristic such as moisture content of corn may decrease with anincrease growing time for the unharvested field as compared to theharvested field, in general this is because after a certain period ofgrowing time moisture content may decrease at a fairly predictable ratebut will not increase further.

At 2440 of flow diagram 2400, in one embodiment, the method as describedin 2410-2430 further includes generating an estimated cropcharacteristic map 2185 of the unharvested field. In one embodiment,estimated crop characteristic map generator 2170 generates the estimatedcrop characteristic map 2185. Estimated crop characteristic map 2185illustrates the estimated crop characteristic(s) relative to locationswithin the unharvested field. In one embodiment, estimated cropcharacteristic map 2185 is generated and output in a tangible form bycomputer system 750, such as by sending estimated crop characteristicmap 2185 to a printer. In other embodiments, this may comprise providingan electronic version of estimated crop characteristic map 2185 whichmay be displayed on a display device, printed, or utilized in anothermanner. Estimated crop characteristic map 2185A of FIG. 22 provides oneexample of an estimated crop characteristic map 2185.

At 2450 of flow diagram 2400, in one embodiment, the method as describedin 2440 further includes generating a harvest path 2190 for theunharvested field based on the estimated crop characteristic map 2185.In one embodiment, harvest path generator 2175 generates the harvestpath 2190. As described previously, in some embodiments, the harvestpath 2190 may be generated based upon the estimated crop characteristicmap 2190 and a specified crop characteristic value 2110. The specifiedcrop characteristic value 2110 may be above or below a certain estimatedvalue for a crop characteristic, or a range of estimated values for thecrop characteristic. Other user specified information such as a desiredgeneral direction of travel of a combine and/or width/number of rowscovered by a combine head may be received by harvest path generator asinputs upon which a generation of a harvest path 2190 is based. Harvestpath 2190A of FIG. 23 illustrates one example of a harvest path 2190.

The above description of embodiments is provided to enable any personskilled in the art to make or use the disclosure. The describedembodiments have been presented for purposes of illustration anddescription and are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit thedescription of embodiments to the precise forms disclosed. Variousmodifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to thoseskilled in the art, and the principles defined herein may be applied toother embodiments without departing from the scope of the disclosure.Thus, the disclosure is not intended to be limited to the embodimentsshown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with theprinciples and novel features disclosed herein.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of ensuring crop treatmentcompatibility, said method comprising: receiving crop treatmentinformation at a computer system, said crop treatment informationcomprising a real-time location of a crop treatment applicator and adescription of a crop treatment resident in said crop treatmentapplicator; accessing, by said computer system, planted crop informationfor a planted field which encompasses said real-time location, saidplanted crop information comprising a description of a planted crop insaid planted field and a second planted crop in a field bordering saidplanted field, and said planted crop information further comprisingactual real-time growth information of said planted crop obtainedsubsequent planting of said planted crop; determining, by said computersystem, whether said crop treatment is compatible with application tosaid planted crop and with said second planted crop in the fieldbordering said planted field, wherein said determining is based on saidgrowth information of said planted crop in said planted field; and inresponse to determining said crop treatment is not compatible withapplication to any one of said planted crop and said second plantedcrop, initiating, in real-time from said computer system, a croptreatment incompatibility action, said crop treatment incompatibilityaction comprising sending a real-time notification of crop treatmentincompatibility from said computer system to a crop treatmentapplication company, and further in response to determining said croptreatment is not compatible with application to any one of said plantedcrop and said second planted crop said crop treatment is prevented frombeing or is ceased from being dispersed from said crop treatmentapplicator to said any one of said planted crop and said second plantedcrop.
 2. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising: inresponse to determining said crop treatment is compatible with saidplanted crop, initiating, in real-time from said computer system, a croptreatment compatibility action.
 3. The method as recited in claim 2,wherein said initiating, in real-time from said computer system, a croptreatment compatibility action comprises: sending a real-timenotification of crop treatment compatibility from said computer systemto an entity selected from the group of entities consisting of: an ownerof said planted field, a farmer of said planted field, an operator ofsaid crop treatment applicator, a crop treatment application company, acrop insurance company, and a reporting agent coupled with said croptreatment applicator.
 4. The method as recited in claim 2, wherein saidinitiating, in real-time from said computer system, a crop treatmentcompatibility action comprises: sending a real-time enable command to areporting agent coupled with a control system of said crop treatmentapplicator, said enable command configured to cause said control systemto enable application of said crop treatment.
 5. The method as recitedin claim 1, further comprising: in response to determining said croptreatment is compatible with all of said bordering planted fields,initiating, in real-time from said computer system, a bordering fieldcrop treatment compatibility action.
 6. The method as recited in claim1, wherein said receiving crop treatment information at a computersystem comprises: receiving said crop treatment information from areporting agent coupled with said crop treatment applicator.
 7. Themethod as recited in claim 1, wherein said accessing, by said computersystem, planted crop information for a planted field which encompassessaid real-time location comprises: accessing, by said computer system,said planted crop information from a database, wherein said descriptionof said planted crop in said planted field comprises: a type of cropseed planted in said planted field, and an age of said planted crop. 8.The method as recited in claim 1, wherein said determining, by saidcomputer system, whether said crop treatment is compatible withapplication to said planted crop comprises: evaluating said planted cropinformation and said crop treatment information for compatibility basedupon one or more stored compatibility rules resident in said computersystem.
 9. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein said initiating, inreal-time from said computer system, a crop treatment incompatibilityaction further comprises: sending a real-time notification of croptreatment incompatibility from said computer system to an entityselected from the group of entities consisting of: an owner of saidplanted field, a farmer of said planted field, an operator of said croptreatment applicator, a crop insurance company, and a reporting agentcoupled with said crop treatment applicator.
 10. The method as recitedin claim 1, wherein said initiating, in real-time from said computersystem, a crop treatment incompatibility action further comprises:sending a real-time disable command to a reporting agent coupled with acontrol system of said crop treatment applicator, said disable commandconfigured to cause said control system to disable application of saidcrop treatment.
 11. A crop treatment compatibility system, said systemcomprising: a crop treatment compatibility determiner disposed in acomputer system, said crop treatment compatibility determiner configuredfor: receiving crop treatment information comprising a real-timelocation of a crop treatment applicator and a description of a croptreatment resident in said crop treatment applicator; and determining ifsaid crop treatment is compatible with a planted crop in a planted fieldwhich encompasses said real-time location and with said second plantedcrop in a field bordering said planted field; a database coupled withsaid crop treatment compatibility determiner and configured with plantedcrop information for a plurality of planted fields including saidplanted field which encompasses said real-time location and said fieldbordering said planted field, said planted crop information comprising adescription of planted crops in each of said plurality of plantedfields, and said planted crop information further comprising actualreal-time growth information of said planted crop obtained subsequentplanting of said planted crop; and a crop treatment action initiatordisposed as a portion of said computer system, coupled with said croptreatment compatibility determiner, and configured for initiating, inreal-time from said computer system, a crop treatment incompatibilityaction in response to said crop treatment compatibility determinerdetermining that said crop treatment is not compatible with applicationto any one of said planted crop and said second planted crop, said croptreatment incompatibility action comprising sending a real-timenotification of crop treatment incompatibility from said computer systemto a crop treatment application company, said crop treatmentincompatibility action further comprising in response to determiningsaid crop treatment is not compatible with application to any one ofsaid planted crop and said second planted crop said crop treatment isprevented from being or ceases from being dispersed from said croptreatment applicator to said any one of said planted crop and saidsecond planted crop.
 12. The system of claim 11, further comprising: areporting source coupled with said crop treatment applicator andconfigured for wirelessly reporting said real-time location and saiddescription of a crop treatment resident in said crop treatmentapplicator.
 13. The system of claim 11, wherein said crop treatmentaction initiator is further configured for initiating, in real-time fromsaid computer system, a crop treatment compatibility action in responseto a determination by said crop treatment compatibility determiner thatsaid crop treatment is compatible with application to said planted crop.14. The system of claim 11, wherein said crop treatment action initiatoris further configured for initiating, in real-time from said computersystem, a bordering field crop treatment incompatibility action, inresponse to said crop treatment compatibility determiner determiningthat said crop treatment is not compatible with at least one of saidbordering planted fields.
 15. The system of claim 11, wherein said croptreatment action initiator is further configured for initiating, inreal-time from said computer system, a bordering field crop treatmentcompatibility action, in response to said crop treatment compatibilitydeterminer determining that said crop treatment is compatible withplanted crops of said bordering planted fields.
 16. A crop treatmentapplicator comprising: a crop treatment initiation mechanism; and areporting agent coupled with a control bus of said crop treatmentapplicator and configured for wirelessly reporting a real-time locationof said crop treatment applicator and a description of a crop treatmentresident in said crop treatment applicator to a remote computer systemin response to actuation of said crop treatment initiation mechanism byan operator of said crop treatment applicator, and wherein saidreporting agent is further configured for disabling application of saidcrop treatment by said crop treatment applicator in response toreceiving a disable command from said remote computer system after saidactuation based upon a determination by said remote computer system thatsaid crop treatment is not compatible with application with any one of aplanted crop in a planted field which encompasses said real-timelocation and with a second planted crop in a field bordering saidplanted field, wherein said computer system determines compatibility ofapplication of said crop treatment both with said planted crop and witha second planted crop, and wherein said compatibility is based onplanted crop information comprising actual real-time growth informationof said planted crop obtained subsequent planting of said planted crop.17. The crop treatment applicator of claim 16, wherein said reportingagent is further configured for enabling application of said croptreatment by said crop treatment applicator in response to receiving anenable command from said remote computer system after said actuation.